2022
DOI: 10.1080/01635581.2022.2059091
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) Score and Prognosis in Malignant Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 96 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As time has passed, we have realised that it analyses not only nutritional but also clinical risk and prognosis, due to the fact that it identifies the nutritional risk of the cell stemmed from illness and treatments, which is reflected on clinical risk of the patient. Many articles have proved results in accordance to this in many environments, including cancer (7) , CVD (8) and COVID-19 (9) .…”
mentioning
confidence: 69%
“…As time has passed, we have realised that it analyses not only nutritional but also clinical risk and prognosis, due to the fact that it identifies the nutritional risk of the cell stemmed from illness and treatments, which is reflected on clinical risk of the patient. Many articles have proved results in accordance to this in many environments, including cancer (7) , CVD (8) and COVID-19 (9) .…”
mentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Ethical approval for the study was obtained from the University of Health Sciences, Bursa Sehir Training & Research Hospital ethical committee (2023-12/7). The patients were classified according to CONUT scores as low (0-4) and High (5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12), and further classified as Normal (0-1), Mild (2-4), Moderate (5-9), and High (9)(10)(11)(12). The data was compared among the groups.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A higher CONUT score implies poor nutritional status, with higher scores linked to more significant morbidity and mortality. CONUT scores were classified as low (0-4) and High (5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12), and further classified as Normal (0-2), Mild (3-4), Moderate (5-9), and High (9-12).…”
Section: Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The CONUT score has been proven not only to correlate with malnutrition grade [ 11 ] but also to have a high predictive value concerning clinical outcomes and morbidity. For example, in patients with cancer, a higher CONUT score predicts a lower overall survival, a lower progress/recurrence-free survival, and a lower cancer-specific survival after surgery [ 15 , 16 ], and a similar predictive value has also been observed for non-solid tumors and other hematologic disorders [ 17 , 18 , 19 ]. However, the CONUT score has also been investigated as a predictor of morbidity or mortality in various conditions other than malignancies, for example, in patients undergoing liver transplant [ 20 ] or heart bypass surgery [ 21 ], in patients with acute heart failure [ 22 ], or in patients with pulmonary embolism [ 23 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%