Handbook of Human Motion 2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-14418-4_25
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Conventional Gait Model - Success and Limitations

Abstract: Th e c o nv e n tio n al g ai t m o d els u c c e s s a n d li mit a tio n s

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For this purpose, twenty markers were attached to each participant’s lower body according to the Vicon PlugInGait Lower Body Ai Functional model. The system and marker model were selected for their reliability and validity [ 19 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this purpose, twenty markers were attached to each participant’s lower body according to the Vicon PlugInGait Lower Body Ai Functional model. The system and marker model were selected for their reliability and validity [ 19 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Participants were equipped with 35 reflective skin markers attached over their whole body according to the Conventional Gait Model [23]. Markers' trajectories were measured at 100 Hz using an eight-camera optoelectronic system (MXT 40, Vicon, Oxford, UK), filtered at 6 Hz using a fourth-order Butterworth design and then occlusions were corrected using marker intercorrelations [24].…”
Section: Measurement Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The conventional gait model (CGM) is a very widely used biomechanical model to calculate kinematic and kinetic variables in gait analysis [16]. It has been extensively validated but there are still some issues regarding its reliability, mainly due to its unconstrained segment dimensions which makes it more exposed to sources of errors [18]. The six-degree-of-freedom (6DoF) models are the most common alternative to the CGM that, despite needing more extensive validation [18], assumes that the segments are rigid and do not constrain the joints motions [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been extensively validated but there are still some issues regarding its reliability, mainly due to its unconstrained segment dimensions which makes it more exposed to sources of errors [18]. The six-degree-of-freedom (6DoF) models are the most common alternative to the CGM that, despite needing more extensive validation [18], assumes that the segments are rigid and do not constrain the joints motions [19]. Several 6DoF modeling techniques were used in the assessment of repeatability in participants with motor and physical characteristics limiting the normal gait [14,20,21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%