2002
DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.87.5.875
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The convergent and discriminant validity of subjective fit perceptions.

Abstract: This study examined whether employees develop perceptions about 3 different types of fit: person-organization fit, needs-supplies fit, and demands-abilities fit. Confirmatory factor analyses of data from 2 different samples strongly suggested that employees differentiate between these 3 types of fit. Furthermore, results from a longitudinal design of 187 managers supported both the convergent and discriminant validity of the different types of fit perceptions. Specifically, person-organization fit perceptions … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

61
1,825
6
49

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,594 publications
(1,941 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
61
1,825
6
49
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, person-organization fit may refer to the congruence of personal and organizational values, and person-job fit to that between the skills and/or knowledge of an employee and what the job requires (Cable and DeRue 2002). P-E fit has been linked to several outcome variables, such as job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and citizenship behavior (Cable and Edwards 2004;Cable and DeRue 2002;Kristof-Brown et al 2005), but also to job or career transitions. For example, Kristof-Brown et al (2005) show that the perceived person-job fit leads to lower intentions to quit a job, and Carless (2005) finds evidence for a direct link between a perceived personjob fit and the intention to accept a job offer.…”
Section: Person-career Fitmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, person-organization fit may refer to the congruence of personal and organizational values, and person-job fit to that between the skills and/or knowledge of an employee and what the job requires (Cable and DeRue 2002). P-E fit has been linked to several outcome variables, such as job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and citizenship behavior (Cable and Edwards 2004;Cable and DeRue 2002;Kristof-Brown et al 2005), but also to job or career transitions. For example, Kristof-Brown et al (2005) show that the perceived person-job fit leads to lower intentions to quit a job, and Carless (2005) finds evidence for a direct link between a perceived personjob fit and the intention to accept a job offer.…”
Section: Person-career Fitmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The underlying premise is that of the compatibility between people and their environment-the latter of which can refer, for example, to an organization, job, or supervisor (Kristof-Brown et al 2005). For example, person-organization fit may refer to the congruence of personal and organizational values, and person-job fit to that between the skills and/or knowledge of an employee and what the job requires (Cable and DeRue 2002). P-E fit has been linked to several outcome variables, such as job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and citizenship behavior (Cable and Edwards 2004;Cable and DeRue 2002;Kristof-Brown et al 2005), but also to job or career transitions.…”
Section: Person-career Fitmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…P-O fit refers to the compatibility between people and organization. [6]. In the present research, personal variable is organizational citizenship behavior; organizational commitment and organizational learning belong to the field of organizational variable.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As employees engage in these behaviors, the possibility that they will obtain desired rewards will also increase, which will result in increases in levels of perceived needs-supplies fit. Finally, the third fit construct, demands-abilities fit is considered the perceived match between individual abilities and what is demanded of them by a specific job and its duties and responsibilities (Cable & DeRue, 2002). Employees who are more proactive in their personalities will take more action to meet demands of a certain situation.…”
Section: Proactive Personality and Socializationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aggregate construct of employee perceived fit will be based on the three different dimensions of fit will be addressed in this study based on Cable and DeRue (2002 individual's needs and the rewards they receive for their efforts and contributions in the workplace (Cable & DeRue, 2002). Not only will individuals who are inclined to take personal initiative be more likely to engage in actions outside of their prescribed job description, which could result in higher frequency of rewards, but they also may be more likely to seek out actions that will provide them with what they desire, or need.…”
Section: Proactive Personality and Socializationmentioning
confidence: 99%