1940
DOI: 10.1021/ja01858a508
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Conversion of Chlorophyll to Pheophytin

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
26
0

Year Published

1950
1950
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All food preparation and cooking procedures caused a significantly higher degradation of chlorophyll a than chlorophyll b (45.6 ± 8.0% compared with 32.8 ± 9.8%), which is in line with earlier reports on chlorophyll degradation (Mackinney and Joslyn 1940;Schanderl and others 1962;Siefermann-Harms and Ninnemann 1983). However, as chlorophyll content and enzyme activities differ between plant parts and plant species, degradation pathways and rate of chlorophyll degradation may differ.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…All food preparation and cooking procedures caused a significantly higher degradation of chlorophyll a than chlorophyll b (45.6 ± 8.0% compared with 32.8 ± 9.8%), which is in line with earlier reports on chlorophyll degradation (Mackinney and Joslyn 1940;Schanderl and others 1962;Siefermann-Harms and Ninnemann 1983). However, as chlorophyll content and enzyme activities differ between plant parts and plant species, degradation pathways and rate of chlorophyll degradation may differ.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…8,9 Though this may be a clue for the choice of Zn, quantitative comparison has been done in only a limited number of works on the pheophytinization of Mg-(B)Chls. [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17] In this work, we compared the pheophytinization rate of Zn-(B)Chl a with that of Mg-(B)Chl a as a function of pH, to find a remarkably high resistance of Zn-BChl a to acid.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous attempts to determine the reaction order n produced contradictory results. Early studies conclude that this reaction is first-order in proton concentration (n ϭ 1) (34,35), whereas more recent work indicates that it is a second-order reaction (n ϭ 2) (36,37). In this work the reaction was studied at sufficiently high acid concentrations, so that it shows exponential kinetics with a pseudo-first-order rate constant kЈ that is given by kЈ…”
Section: Optimizing the Instrument Parameters For Stoppedflow Esi Msmentioning
confidence: 99%