2021
DOI: 10.3390/met11020259
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The COOL-Process—A Selective Approach for Recycling Lithium Batteries

Abstract: The global market of lithium-ion batteries (LIB) has been growing in recent years, mainly owed to electromobility. The global LIB market is forecasted to amount to $129.3 billion in 2027. Considering the global reserves needed to produce these batteries and their limited lifetime, efficient recycling processes for secondary sources are mandatory. A selective process for Li recycling from LIB black mass is described. Depending on the process parameters Li was recovered almost quantitatively by the COOL-Process … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The recycling process depicted in Fig. 1 had previously been developed and optimized for obtaining Li 2 CO 3 by the COOL‐process 2. In the present work, the starting material is the solid residue obtained after the COOL process, which is after leaching black mass with sc ‐CO 2 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The recycling process depicted in Fig. 1 had previously been developed and optimized for obtaining Li 2 CO 3 by the COOL‐process 2. In the present work, the starting material is the solid residue obtained after the COOL process, which is after leaching black mass with sc ‐CO 2 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The solid residue obtained from the COOL‐process, which was carried out according to the optimized parameters described by Pavón et al. (230 °C for 4 h with a water/black mass ratio of 90 mL g −1 ) 2, was treated in a first digestion stage with different leaching reagents with a concentration of 2 N Sulfuric acid (95 %, Thermo Fischer Scientific, MA, USA), hydrochloric acid (37 %, VWR International, PA, USA), citric acid (99+ %, Alfa Aesar, MA, USA), and gluconic acid (50 %, Sigma‐Aldrich, MO, USA) as well as different concentrations of hydrogen peroxide (0–6 vol %; 30 %, Th. Geyer, Renningen, Germany) were tested.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations