The coordination between train traffic controllers and train drivers: a distributed cognition perspective on railway

Abstract

Although there has long been a call for a holistic systems perspective to better understand real work in the complex domain of railway traffic, prior research has not strongly emphasised the socio-technical perspective. In operational railway traffic, the successful planning and execution of the traffic are the product of the socio-technical system comprised by both train drivers and traffic controllers. This paper presents a study inspired by cognitive ethnography with the aim to characterise the coordinating activities that are conducted by train traffic controllers and train drivers in the work practices of the sociotechnical system of Swedish railway. The theoretical framework of distributed cognition (DCog) is used as a conceptual and analytical tool to make sense of the complex railway domain and the best practices as they are developed and performed "in the wild". The analysis reveals a pattern of collaboration and coordination of actions among the workers and we introduce the concept of enacted actionable practices as a key concern for understanding how a successfully executed railway traffic emerges as a property of the socio-technical system. The implications for future railway research are briefly discussed.

Artificial Intelligence Component of the FERODATA AI Engine to Optimize the Assignment of Rail Freight Locomotive Drivers

“…Consistent scientific evidence shows that the primary outcome of economic significance would be the reduction in costs through the efficient utilization of train resources, particularly train personnel, including vehicle drivers [25]. Efficient driver assignment through automation can lead to cost savings by reducing overtime expenses, optimizing resource utilization, and minimizing disruptions due to unplanned driver unavailability [26].…”

Keeping the service running: Examining working relationships and workload of London bus network iBus controllers

“…Maintaining a good working relationship between controllers and drivers can be seen as essential in continuing a good transport service because both roles contribute to the overall effectiveness of the service (Andreasson et al, 2019). Therefore, any steps taken to improve the working relationship between both parties can be seen as beneficial.…”

“…Since the iBus controllers are regulating the bus service, they necessarily continuously communicate with the drivers on any route for which they are responsible. It can therefore be seen that there is a need to co-ordinate actions between controllers and drivers in order to make the system work; this requirement can also be seen in the findings of a study in a similar but different context -that of train drivers and train traffic controllers (Andreasson et al, 2019). In order to deliver a timely and efficient service, the London bus network requires controllers and drivers to work together effectively.…”

Modelling operator control work across traffic management domains: implications for interaction design

“…The loop represents the cyclical and recurrent nature of control processes, even though actual events unfold on a timeline. Regarding time, it has for instance been shown in TTM that time frames are important to consider, since time pressure affects their strategies (Andreasson et al 2019;Axelsson and Jansson 2018). Moreover, in TTM, with experience comes (perhaps unsurprisingly) the ability to visually focus more (fixate them longer, finding them faster) on task-relevant areas in the environment (Axelsson and Jansson 2022).…”