1965
DOI: 10.1136/ard.24.3.257
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Coracoclavicular Joint and Related Pathological Conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
11
2
5

Year Published

1984
1984
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
11
2
5
Order By: Relevance
“…In a present radiological study, the prevalence of CCJ was found to be 4.6% while, the other studies showed 0.55%-4.3% prevalence. 1,3,6,10,11 The study conducted in Northwest Indians reported 10.1% prevalence of CCJ which is much higher than that of our study. 12 Few literature showed much variation (0.78%-16%) in occurrence of CCJ in osteological study.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 60%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In a present radiological study, the prevalence of CCJ was found to be 4.6% while, the other studies showed 0.55%-4.3% prevalence. 1,3,6,10,11 The study conducted in Northwest Indians reported 10.1% prevalence of CCJ which is much higher than that of our study. 12 Few literature showed much variation (0.78%-16%) in occurrence of CCJ in osteological study.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 60%
“…None of the children had CCJ in the study conducted by Chopra. 5 In a study by De Hass, prevalence of CCJ in the children up to 12 years of age was 1.5%, 1 while it was much lesser (0.002%) in our study. Majority of the joint was present in third and fourth decade of life in the present study and gradually declines thereafter.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 53%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Several suggestions concerning the ontogeny of the coracoclavicular joint have been proposed. De Haas et al, 1965 described 1 large family in which the condition appeared to be inherited as an autosomal dominant trait [7]. Pillay (1967) [8] classified the joint according to its developmental stage as: grade I, fully developed joint with fibrocartilage lined articular surfaces and entire articular capsule, and grade II, a primitive or imperfect joint where the clavicle and the coracoid articulate with each other, and sometimes the facet is present only on the clavicle, without any cartilage covered articular surface or capsule.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%