2021
DOI: 10.1007/s11631-021-00503-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The core-merging giant impact in Earth’s accretion history and its implications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The resolution level is sufficient to accurately model the stripping of mantle material as described in previous giant impact models (Meier et al., 2021), and it is therefore expected to adequately model energy deposition from the shock wave. The simulation time for most collisions is about 34 hr, thought a few high‐energy cases are extended to about 51 hr, consistent with previous simulations (e.g., Chau et al., 2021; Reinhardt et al., 2020, 2022; Zhou et al., 2021).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The resolution level is sufficient to accurately model the stripping of mantle material as described in previous giant impact models (Meier et al., 2021), and it is therefore expected to adequately model energy deposition from the shock wave. The simulation time for most collisions is about 34 hr, thought a few high‐energy cases are extended to about 51 hr, consistent with previous simulations (e.g., Chau et al., 2021; Reinhardt et al., 2020, 2022; Zhou et al., 2021).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…This may result in an overestimation of the temperature of core particles at the CMB. In the case of direct core‐merging collisions, the impactor metal core remains mostly intact and merges with proto‐Earth's core during the several hours’ impact simulation, implying minimal heat exchange with the mantle (Zhou et al., 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation