2015
DOI: 10.1016/s2212-5671(15)00395-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Corporate Social Responsibility Practices in The Context of Sustainable Development. The Case of Romania

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
9
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Sarıkaya ve Kara (2007), Kuşat (2012), sürdürülebilir kalkınmada firmaların rolünü ele alırken, Yaylı (2012), Ergün ve Çobanoğlu (2012), çevre etiği ile ilişkisini teorik çerçevede ele almışlardır. Karataş ve Çankaya (2010), Keskin (2011) Popa (2015), İyigün (2015), Kolk (2016) kurumsal sosyal sorumluluk ve sürdürülebilir kalkınma arasındaki ilişkiyi teorik çerçevede ele almışlardır. Rondinelli ve Berry (2000), 38 çok uluslu firmanın sürdürülebilir kalkınma hedeflerine ulaşmak için yaptıkları uygulamaları, çevresel performans raporlarını kullanarak içerik analizi yöntemiyle incelemişlerdir.…”
Section: Yazın Taramasıunclassified
“…Sarıkaya ve Kara (2007), Kuşat (2012), sürdürülebilir kalkınmada firmaların rolünü ele alırken, Yaylı (2012), Ergün ve Çobanoğlu (2012), çevre etiği ile ilişkisini teorik çerçevede ele almışlardır. Karataş ve Çankaya (2010), Keskin (2011) Popa (2015), İyigün (2015), Kolk (2016) kurumsal sosyal sorumluluk ve sürdürülebilir kalkınma arasındaki ilişkiyi teorik çerçevede ele almışlardır. Rondinelli ve Berry (2000), 38 çok uluslu firmanın sürdürülebilir kalkınma hedeflerine ulaşmak için yaptıkları uygulamaları, çevresel performans raporlarını kullanarak içerik analizi yöntemiyle incelemişlerdir.…”
Section: Yazın Taramasıunclassified
“…For example, an executive body of the European Union collectively defined CSR as “A concept whereby companies integrate social and environmental concerns in their business operations and in their interaction with their stakeholders on a voluntary basis” (Commission of the European Communities, 2002, p. 8). Further, both Michael (2003, p. 115) and Popa (2015, p. 1280) make use of the World Business Council’s characterization of CSR as “a commitment by business to behave ethically and contribute to economic development while improving the quality of life of the workforce and their families, as well as of the local community and society at large.” The Australian Human Rights Commission (2008) highlights that while the meaning and value of CSR varies considerably based on cultural, environment, and legal factors, CSR “is generally understood to mean that corporations have a degree of responsibility not only for the economic consequences of their activities, but also for the social and environmental implications.” Finally, according to Carroll (1979), one of the most longstanding and authoritative voices on CSR, the concept can be described as a pyramid, consisting of economic, legal, ethical, and philosophical aspects. The approach adopted in this project incorporates a number of the common features in the described definitions as well as some more distinctive aspects in defining CSR as “the phenomenon whereby organizations seek to fulfil social and environmental functions in addition to their core business, doing so on a variety of bases (e.g., voluntary, legal).”…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Romania, companies that carry out social responsibility are valued only for the sake of the company's image, business reputation or interests and stakeholder needs not for sustainable development [2]. In Malaysia, many public companies are late responding to CSR such as environmental preservation and social welfare of the communities where the company operates [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%