2022
DOI: 10.1002/slct.202104502
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Corrected Values of ΔrHo(CaHbOd, a≤16) of Atomization of the Aromatic Compounds and Their Uncertainties Determined Using Several Quantum Mechanical Approaches

Abstract: The empirical linear scaling dependencies between the literature (Δ r H o (X n ,TAB)) and the calculated (Δ r H o ((X n ) i ,CALC)) values of atomization of 31 reference aromatic and related compounds (T = 298.15 K), as well as their standard errors ((SE 4 ) i ffi(σ 4 )i, Stand.Dev.), are determined for the different quantum mechanical (QM i ) approaches. These dependencies are compared and used for the determination of the values of Δ r H o ((X n ) i ,CORRE) � 3(SE 4 ) i of atomization reactions of considered… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in most of the cases, the differences between these values are lying within uncertainty ranges, determined for the values of Δ f H o (Y, MEAN). The relatively high difference, observed in the case of H 2 O 2 , can be partially attributed to the presence of two OH groups, mentioned previously [14] . At the same time, the lower limits of values of Δ f H o (Y, MEAN) of CH 3 O 2 H, H 2 O 2 and HO 2 • , which, are slightly higher than the upper limits of their literature values, demonstrate that at least one of the values of Δ f H o (Y i , CORR) for these compounds is less accurate than it is expected.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 54%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…However, in most of the cases, the differences between these values are lying within uncertainty ranges, determined for the values of Δ f H o (Y, MEAN). The relatively high difference, observed in the case of H 2 O 2 , can be partially attributed to the presence of two OH groups, mentioned previously [14] . At the same time, the lower limits of values of Δ f H o (Y, MEAN) of CH 3 O 2 H, H 2 O 2 and HO 2 • , which, are slightly higher than the upper limits of their literature values, demonstrate that at least one of the values of Δ f H o (Y i , CORR) for these compounds is less accurate than it is expected.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…The uncertainties, reported for the values of Δ f H o (Y i , CORR) in Table 4, correspond to 3SE i . The values of Δ f H o (Y, MEAN) (±3SE Y ), determined from the intersection of 3SE i intervals of Δ f H o (Y i , CORR) values, [14] as well as their literature values of Δ f H o (Y, TAB), are reported in the same Table 4. The values of Δ f H o (Y i , CORR), used for the determination of the upper and lower limits, are italicboldfaced .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…All results presented in this work were calculated with Gaussian 09 package [34] by the M06‐2X method with double Hartree‐Fock exchange functionals [35–38] in conjunction with the standard 6–311+G(d) basis set [39–41] in gas phase. Geometries were fully relaxed, and frequency analysis was carried out to judge a local minimum without imaginary frequency or a transition state with only one imaginary frequency.…”
Section: Computational Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%