1965
DOI: 10.2307/2528555
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Correlation between Feed Efficiency and Rate of Gain, a Ratio and Its Denominator

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
37
0

Year Published

1978
1978
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
6
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Selection for growth rate or live weight would be expected to increase feed intake as well as to improve feed conversion ratio (Turner, 1959;Sutherland, 1965). These estimates agree with previous estimates of genetic correlation for postweaning ADG with feed conversion ratio (feed/gain) of −0.43 for Rambouillet and −1.00 for Romnelet (Vesely et al, 1970) and 0.80 for postweaning ADG with total feed intake for crossbred lambs (Leymaster et al, 2002).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Selection for growth rate or live weight would be expected to increase feed intake as well as to improve feed conversion ratio (Turner, 1959;Sutherland, 1965). These estimates agree with previous estimates of genetic correlation for postweaning ADG with feed conversion ratio (feed/gain) of −0.43 for Rambouillet and −1.00 for Romnelet (Vesely et al, 1970) and 0.80 for postweaning ADG with total feed intake for crossbred lambs (Leymaster et al, 2002).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…SA51 significantly reduced feed efficiency, which is the ratio of feed consumed to live-weight gain in a given period ( Figure 4). 12 Significantly improvement was also observed in the serum concentrations of triglycerides, total cholesterol, and non-esterified fatty acids (NEFAs) ( Table 2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Selec-tion for feed efficiency in broilers has met with some success (Guill and Washburn 1974; Pym and Nicholls 1979) and has been found to be heritable across species 1fi2:0.37 for chickens (Chambers and Gavora 1982); h':0.42 for beef (Simm 1983)). However, use of the feed:gain ratio as a measure of feed efficiency has to be carefully considered, specifically: (i) the existence of a part-whole correlation between a ratio and either its numerator or denominator imparts some concerns (Turner 1959;Sutherland 1965) (Belsley et al 1980), the D influence staristic (Cook 1977), residual analysis, and power transformations (Box and Cox 1964) For personal use only. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%