The correlation between full biophysical profile and rapid biophysical profile in antepartum fetal surveillance

Prabhu, Akshay Vedanga; Mahale, Nina; Mahale, Ajit

doi:10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20150432

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 3 publications

(5 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…[6] 8.8 ---Eden et al [7] 6.8 ---Nageotte et al [3] 5.6 ---Yogitha V et al [2] 30.1 100 88.8 -Soumya et al [8] The present study showed that scores of rapid Biophysical Profile have strong positive correlation with scores of biophysical profile (r 2 = 0.531, P=<0.001) and it was statistically significant. Similar results was reported by Prabhu AV et al [9] Sensitivity, specificity, Negative Predictive value and Positive predictive value was done between rBPP and BPP. The rapid/ modified biophysical profile test is 78% sensitive to Biophysical profile test, which means 78% times the function can identify the cases and classify correctly, as diseased cases with PPV of 61%.…”

Section: Correlation Of Study Outcomes With Rbppsupporting

confidence: 88%

Comparative study of rapid biophysical profile and conventional biophysical profile in predicting perinatal outcome in high risk pregnancies

Anupama¹,

Dwarakanath²,

Sh³

2021

Int. J. Clin. Obstet. Gynaecol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction: Rapid Biophysical profile is quicker and easier to do than a full biophysical profile or a contraction stress test. Furthermore, the rBPP is regarded to be just as useful as a complete biophysical profile. Although the link between rBPP and BPP has been widely used, research is scarce. As a result, the current study looked into the relationship between the two tests, as well as their predictive ability in highrisk pregnancies. Material and Methods: 60 pregnant women with ≥ 32 weeks of singleton gestation, were randomly selected during their hospital visit. They were subjected to USG scan. NST AFI, fetal breathing, fetal tone, and fetal movement will be examined to complete the BPP test. After a 10-minute break, SPFM will be carried out by the same examiner to finish rBPP test. These results were compared with the perinatal outcome.Results: The present study showed that scores of rapid Biophysical Profile have strong positive correlation with scores of biophysical profile (r 2 = 0.531, P = <0.001) and it was statistically significant. The rapid/ modified biophysical profile test is 78% sensitive to Biophysical profile test, which means 78% times the function can identify the cases and classify correctly, as diseased cases with PPV of 61%. Conclusion:The statistically significant positive correlation between rBPP and BPP has been revealed. Due to its simplicity, rapidity, less expensive and no need for experience interpreter, the rBPP can be used as a primary screening antepartum fetal surveillance in the overcrowded obstetric center.

show abstract

Section: Correlation Of Study Outcomes With Rbppsupporting

confidence: 88%

Comparative study of rapid biophysical profile and conventional biophysical profile in predicting perinatal outcome in high risk pregnancies

Anupama¹,

Dwarakanath²,

Sh³

2021

Int. J. Clin. Obstet. Gynaecol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Uterine Biophysical Profile in Infertile Diabetic Women in Mid Luteal Phase

Krishna

Shanmukhi

et al. 2022

Global Journal for Research Analysis

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background and objective: Being unable to conceive can be extremely discouraging and stressful and may eventually have negative social, physiological, and psychological effects like depression. This study's objective was to evaluate how well diabetic women with a history of infertility responded to uterine biophysical prole as a predictor of conception. Method: 137 women with primary infertility participated in a study. Women visiting our institute's infertility OPD and complaining of being unable to get pregnant were the cases chosen for this study. Patients were divided in to two (Non-diabetic) group 1 and group 2 (diabetic). All the women underwent UBP testing at mid-cycle, and it was determined using the uterine scoring system for reproduction (USSR). Results: Signicant differences were seen in Uterine Biophysical Prole (UBP) score i.e.; more or less than 12 among diabetics and non-diabetics. Score of <12 was found to be signicantly more among diabetics. Conclusion: Those with diabetes had a higher chance of miscarriage and infertility, as well as being more likely to be childless than women without the disease.

show abstract

The correlation between full biophysical profile and rapid biophysical profile in antepartum fetal surveillance

Cited by 2 publications

References 3 publications

Comparative study of rapid biophysical profile and conventional biophysical profile in predicting perinatal outcome in high risk pregnancies

Comparative study of rapid biophysical profile and conventional biophysical profile in predicting perinatal outcome in high risk pregnancies

Uterine Biophysical Profile in Infertile Diabetic Women in Mid Luteal Phase

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About