2018
DOI: 10.24167/celt.v18i1.1246
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Correlation between Online Peer Review and Academic Writing Students’ Learning Styles

Abstract: Peer review studies have been done for years. It has been found that by having these activities, learners will get benefits from the communication with the peer who can give them input to improve their writing performance. Peer review can be done face to face or online.  Face to face peer review is done synchronously where two students are having discussion on their essay, whereas online peer review can be done synchronously or asynchronously. This preliminary study investigates how the application of synchron… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the research illustrated that by having a longer time and wider space to give comments, the students had more chances to read their friends' essays thoroughly and considered the feedback more detailed and clearer compared to when they were asked to share comments among their friends in a limited amount of time. This is in agreement with the research carried out by Aydawati, Rukmini, Bharati, and Fitriati (2018) stating that peer feedback activities organized in online environments made the students more focused. As a result, despite only giving corrections on local aspects such as grammar and mechanics, students provided more comments on global writing elements like content and ideas as well as paragraph organization (Jones, Garralda, Li, & Lock, 2006;Liu & Sadler, 2003).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Moreover, the research illustrated that by having a longer time and wider space to give comments, the students had more chances to read their friends' essays thoroughly and considered the feedback more detailed and clearer compared to when they were asked to share comments among their friends in a limited amount of time. This is in agreement with the research carried out by Aydawati, Rukmini, Bharati, and Fitriati (2018) stating that peer feedback activities organized in online environments made the students more focused. As a result, despite only giving corrections on local aspects such as grammar and mechanics, students provided more comments on global writing elements like content and ideas as well as paragraph organization (Jones, Garralda, Li, & Lock, 2006;Liu & Sadler, 2003).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…E.g. Shirgurkar (2018) conducted a study in a foreign language course whereby Lyman and Keyes (2019), Aydawati et al (2018) and Gordijn et al (2018) investigated the improvements in students`ability to write a research proposal. Not all of these studies use questionnaire-based pre-and post-surveys to quantify the effectiveness, and also the impact on the final exam grade itself is rarely investigated.…”
Section: Class Peer Review (Cpr)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is clear that teachers'role in teaching writing determine whether this skill taught "easy" or "difficult" (Juniarti et al, 2017). One of the endeavors to enhance the students' writing skill is the improement in terms of teaching media and instruction (Aydawati et al, 2018). One of the teaching media to use in teaching writing skill is by using english movies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%