The Correlation between Teaching Evaluation and Lecturers’ Performances

Abstract

The purpose of the study is to explore the relationship between teaching evaluation and lecturers’ performances. To achieve this purpose, the study analysed the correlations between teaching evaluation scores by student and evaluation on lecturers’ performances by dean, and between teaching evaluation scores by student and students’ final examination results. Census study was applied to collect all data, which involved 124 lecturers and eight deans. The study used data from the online system, which involved evaluation made for 246 courses by all active students in semester June – November 2018. Descriptive and inferential statistics were applied in this study and analysed using SPSS version 21.0. The result showed that there is no significant relationship between teaching evaluation scores by student and evaluation on lecturers’ performances by dean. This study also found that there is no significant relationship between teaching evaluation scores by student and students’ final examination results. Based on the findings, the study inferred there is bias in the evaluation instruments and there are external factors contributed to the outcome of insignificant correlations in both analyses, thus the effect or impact of the evaluation system to academic division is not significant

English Teaching Evaluation Model Based on Association Rule Algorithm and Machine Learning

“…He made showing more viable through his exploration on instructing assessment [3]. Ruslim explored the relationship between teaching evaluation and lecturer performance [4]. In light of AI, Liu momentarily presented the foundation and current circumstance of instructing assessment.…”

The Teaching Evaluation Index System and Intelligent Evaluation Methods of Vocational Undergraduate Pilot Colleges

“…The focus of our country's professional undergraduate pilot colleges has shifted from accelerating the construction of colleges and universities to strengthening the construction of colors [1,2]. The professional assessment of the vocational undergraduate pilot college mainly assesses all aspects related to the profession.…”

Evaluation Method of Students’ “Hierarchical” Education Management Effect Based on Data Mining

“…According to the analysis of Figure 4, the accuracy of management effect evaluation is different under different methods. When the data volume is 100 GB, the management effect evaluation accuracy rate of Reference [5] method is 60.2%, the management effect evaluation accuracy rate of Reference [6] method is 62.5%, and the management effect evaluation accuracy rate of this method is 96.8%. When the data volume is 800 GB, the management effect evaluation accuracy rate of Reference [5] method is 59.8%, the management effect evaluation accuracy rate of Reference [6] method is 58.6%, and the management effect evaluation accuracy rate of this method is 98.0%.…”

“…In order to test the evaluation effect of computer experiment teaching effect of data mining, the simulation experiment is carried out in the test environment shown in Table 2. In order to make the experimental results comparable, under the same test environment, the evaluation method of Reference [5] and the evaluation method of Reference [6] are selected for comparative experiment, and the evaluation accuracy and evaluation time of education management effect are selected as the evaluation criteria of the experimental results. The evaluation experiment of educational management effect is carried out with reference to the above parameters.…”

“…This method can improve the evaluation accuracy, but the evaluation efficiency is poor. Reference [6] puts forward the teaching effect evaluation method [6], establishes the evaluation system of college students' teaching resources, analyzes the evaluation indexes by using the grey correlation method, uses the neural network to fit the nonlinear mapping relationship between input and output through learning, and finally evaluates and analyzes the college students' teaching resources. This method can improve the evaluation efficiency, but the evaluation accuracy is poor.…”