2021
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stab016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The correlation of high-redshift galaxies with the thermal Sunyaev–Zel’dovich effect traces reionization

Abstract: We explore a potential new probe of reionization: the cross-correlation of high-redshift galaxies with maps of the thermal Sunyaev–Zel’dovich (tSZ) effect. We consider two types of high-redshift galaxies: Lyman break galaxies (LBGs) and Lyman-α emitters (LAEs). LBGs and LAEs will be detected in large numbers at high redshift (z ≈ 4–7) by ongoing and future surveys. We consider a future LBG sample from The Rubin Observatory Legacy Survey of Space and Time, and a selection of LAEs modelled after the Subaru SILVE… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to break degeneracies between parameters, detect systematics, and allow a fruitful analysis of available data sets, a consistent analysis of the different observables of reionisation seems to be a promising avenue. Indeed, several works have already demonstrated the potential offered by a combined analysis of astrophysical and CMB data (e.g., Millea & Bouchet 2018;Qin et al 2020;Chatterjee et al 2021;Baxter et al 2021;Sato-Polito et al 2021;La Plante et al 2022), 21 cm andCMB data (e.g., Tashiro et al 2011;Alvarez 2016;Ma et al 2018;Hotinli & Johnson 2022;La Plante et al 2020;Billings et al 2021;Choudhury et al 2021;Ahn & Shapiro 2021;Bégin et al 2022), or different types of CMB data (e.g., Planck Collaboration XLVII 2016; Alvarez et al 2021;Namikawa et al 2021;Paul et al 2021;Roy et al 2021).…”
Section: Cosmological Constraintsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to break degeneracies between parameters, detect systematics, and allow a fruitful analysis of available data sets, a consistent analysis of the different observables of reionisation seems to be a promising avenue. Indeed, several works have already demonstrated the potential offered by a combined analysis of astrophysical and CMB data (e.g., Millea & Bouchet 2018;Qin et al 2020;Chatterjee et al 2021;Baxter et al 2021;Sato-Polito et al 2021;La Plante et al 2022), 21 cm andCMB data (e.g., Tashiro et al 2011;Alvarez 2016;Ma et al 2018;Hotinli & Johnson 2022;La Plante et al 2020;Billings et al 2021;Choudhury et al 2021;Ahn & Shapiro 2021;Bégin et al 2022), or different types of CMB data (e.g., Planck Collaboration XLVII 2016; Alvarez et al 2021;Namikawa et al 2021;Paul et al 2021;Roy et al 2021).…”
Section: Cosmological Constraintsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ref. [19] proposes to use the cross-correlation between tSZ and high-redshift galaxies for another reionization probe. Alternatively, the kinetic SZ (kSZ) effect generated by the radial motion of ionized bubbles during reionization could be detected by future CMB experiments, which will potentially constrain the redshift and duration of reionization [20][21][22][23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Baxter et al (2021) study the cross-correlation between the tSZ signal and reionization-era galaxy surveys. The tSZ fluctations from the EoR contain interesting information about the thermal state of the IGM during reionization but, as discussed in that work, are weaker than the kSZ anisotropies from reionization considered here.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%