2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2021.111070
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The correlation of taste and chemesthetic sensation in individuals with different suprathreshold sensitivities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings prove that chemesthesis sensitivity has more interactions between its modalities than with taste modalities. Similar chemesthetic interaction was found between pungency (Sichuan pepper oleoresin) and heat (capsaicin) in research that used a similar methodology of measuring and analyzing individual sensitivity [40].…”
Section: Oral Chemesthesis Sensitivity Group Interactionssupporting
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These findings prove that chemesthesis sensitivity has more interactions between its modalities than with taste modalities. Similar chemesthetic interaction was found between pungency (Sichuan pepper oleoresin) and heat (capsaicin) in research that used a similar methodology of measuring and analyzing individual sensitivity [40].…”
Section: Oral Chemesthesis Sensitivity Group Interactionssupporting
confidence: 54%
“…For further studies, the association between PROP taster status and chemesthesis sensitivity will also be suspected. Zhang et al (2021) studied the correlation between taste and chemesthesis by applying pungency (Sichuan pepper oleoresin), heat (capsaicin), bitterness (PROP), and saltiness (NaCl) [40]. Their study showed that the sensitivity to bitterness could be partly predicted by the heat of capsaicin and pungency of Sichuan pepper oleoresin.…”
Section: Interactions Between Chemesthesis and Taste Sensitivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results showed that 2.00 g/L (41.67%, proportion of the preference panelists) and 6.00 g/L (38.89%) were the most preferred salt solutions (Figure S1), which suggested that all panelists had different saltiness preferences. The result of this work was consistent with the report by Zhang et al 35 that there were high and low sensitivity groups in saltiness perception. Therefore, 2.00 and 6.00 g/L NaCl solutions were used for further salt substitution experiments.…”
Section: Preference Tests Of Saltiness Perceptionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…In this section, TDS was applied to evaluate the differences between the salt-reduced solution and non-salt-reduced solution. The oral processing times of the salt solution were 0, 20,25,30,35,40,45,50, 55, and 60 s, respectively. Two milliliters of salt solution were added into the mouth at each test, and the panelists had 5 min between each test to rinse mouth, drink, and rest until no peculiar taste lasted in the mouth before the next experiment.…”
Section: Temporal Dominance Of Sensations (Tds) Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Certain substances, such as capsaicin, elicit the sensation in question, which interacts with receptors located in the oral cavity and on the tongue . The experience of spiciness is classified as chemesthetic perception, indicating its association with chemical senses rather than fundamental tastes, such as sweetness, saltiness, sourness, bitterness, and umami . The sensation of spiciness is typically described as a feeling of heat, burning, or irritation in the mouth and on the tongue.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%