The Correspondence Principle in the Quantum Network 1918–1926

Jähnert, Martin

doi:10.1007/978-3-030-13300-9_3

Archimedes

2019

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-13300-9_3

|View full text |Cite

The Correspondence Principle in the Quantum Network 1918–1926

Martin Jähnert

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2021

Publication Types

Select...

Article1

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent1

Authors

Journals

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 18 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…For more comprehensive accounts of CP, see e.g Darrigol 1997, Tanona 2002, Tanona 2004, Bokulich and Bokulich 2005, Bokulich 2008, Jähnert 2019, and Perovic 2021…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Permanence as a principle of practice

Toader

2021

Historia Mathematica

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Dedicated to the memory of Mic Detlefsen The paper discusses Peano's argument for preserving familiar notations. The argument reinforces the principle of permanence, articulated in the early 19th century by Peacock, then adjusted by Hankel and adopted by many others. Typically regarded as a principle of theoretical rationality, permanence was understood by Peano, following Mach, and against Schubert, as a principle of practical rationality. The paper considers how permanence, thus understood, was used in justifying Burali-Forti and Marcolongo's notation for vectorial calculus, and in rejecting Frege's logical notation, and closes by considering Hahn's revival of Peano's argument against Pringsheim' reading of permanence as a logically necessary principle. Der Beitrag diskutiert Peanos Argument für die Bewahrung vertrauter Notationen. Es geht um das Prinzip der Permanenz, das im frühen 19. Jahrhundert von Peacock artikuliert, dann von Hankel angepasst und von vielen anderenübernommen wurde. Während es im allgemeinen als ein Prinzip der theoretischen Rationalität betrachtet wurde, interpretierte Peano es anknüpfend an Mach und gerichtet gegen Schubert als ein Prinzip der praktischen Rationalität. Der Beitrag untersucht, wie Permanenz, so verstanden, von Burali-Forti und Marcolongo zur Rechtfertigung von Bezeichnungen in der Vektorrechnung verwendet wurde und zur Zurückweisung der logischen Notation Freges führte. Die Arbeit schließt mit einer Erörterung der Wiederbelebung des Peanoschen Arguments in Hahns Kritik von Pringsheims Interpretation der Permanenz als ein logisch notwendiges Prinzip.

show abstract

“…For more comprehensive accounts of CP, see e.g Darrigol 1997, Tanona 2002, Tanona 2004, Bokulich and Bokulich 2005, Bokulich 2008, Jähnert 2019, and Perovic 2021…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Permanence as a principle of practice

Toader

2021

Historia Mathematica

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.

Contact Info

customersupport@researchsolutions.com

10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614

Henderson, NV 89052, USA

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Blog Terms and Conditions API Terms Privacy Policy Contact Cookie Preferences Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information

Made with 💙 for researchers

Part of the Research Solutions Family.

The Correspondence Principle in the Quantum Network 1918–1926

Cited by 1 publication

References 18 publications

Permanence as a principle of practice

Permanence as a principle of practice

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About