2011
DOI: 10.1080/15567030903485951
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Corresponding-States Correlation for the Prediction of Crude Oil Undersaturated Densities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 3 shows that predicted values and real measured values are very close together. Table 4 shows a comparison of our results with four previously published works (Alani and Kennedy, 1960;Ahmed, 1998;Al-Marhoun, 2003;Azin et al, 2011). In the case of Al-Marhoun (2003), the mentioned correlations are indirect methods for calculating density; for instance, we used Al-Mahroun's correlation to calculate undersaturated isothermal compressibility and predict the density for P > P b .…”
Section: Experimental Results Comparison With Other Work and Discumentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figure 3 shows that predicted values and real measured values are very close together. Table 4 shows a comparison of our results with four previously published works (Alani and Kennedy, 1960;Ahmed, 1998;Al-Marhoun, 2003;Azin et al, 2011). In the case of Al-Marhoun (2003), the mentioned correlations are indirect methods for calculating density; for instance, we used Al-Mahroun's correlation to calculate undersaturated isothermal compressibility and predict the density for P > P b .…”
Section: Experimental Results Comparison With Other Work and Discumentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Correlations such as StandingKatz (1942) and Alani-Kennedy (1960) are examples of this kind. Recently, a correlation was presented by Azin et al (2011) based on the previous work of Thomson et al (Thomson and Hankinson, 1979;Thomson et al, 1982) for the estimation of compressed fluid densities or the prediction of fluid densities at elevated pressures. We show that the model presented in this article has less error than both Azin et al (2011) and AlaniKennedy (1960).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%