2019
DOI: 10.1051/epjconf/201920803001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The cosmic ray energy spectrum measured with the new Tibet hybrid experiment

Abstract: We have upgraded the new Tibet ASgamma experiment in China since 2014 to measure the chemical composition of cosmic rays around the knee. This hybrid experiment consist of an air-shower-core detector array (YAC-II) to detect high energy electromagnetic component, the Tibet air-shower array (Tibet-III) and a large underground water-Cherenkov muon-detector array (MD). We have carried out a detailed air-shower Monte Carlo (MC) simulation to study the performance of the hybrid detectors by using CORSIKA (version 7… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We also see that our result is in agreement with ATIC-2 and NUCLEON within systematic uncertainties, but it seems to be above DAMPE (at low energies) and CREAM data. The HAWC spectrum is also above the ARGO-YBJ [4] and TIBET AS−γ [33] measurements, but in agreement with EAS-TOP data [5].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…We also see that our result is in agreement with ATIC-2 and NUCLEON within systematic uncertainties, but it seems to be above DAMPE (at low energies) and CREAM data. The HAWC spectrum is also above the ARGO-YBJ [4] and TIBET AS−γ [33] measurements, but in agreement with EAS-TOP data [5].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…1(a) and 1(b) the flux of cosmic rays is shown with black markers. For simplicity, just the Tibet-AS data are shown [11]. The flux was scaled to the same solid angle of 1 • as the measured gamma-ray flux.…”
Section: Expected Fluxes and Required Separation Powermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2) It is worthwhile to note that there is no serious difference among the current interaction models on the particle production in the forward region at the knee energy region since all the models are well tuned using recent accelerator data including LHC [8,9]. Therefore, we can separate primary proton events from other nuclei almost independently of the used hadronic interaction models by using the Tibet hybrid experiment (YAC-II + Tibet-III) [10]. This is the key to successfully check the muon numbers in this work.…”
Section: Jinst 17 P06006mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…energy region since all the models are well tuned using recent accelerator data including LHC [8,9]. Therefore, we can separate primary proton events with high precision from other nuclei almost independently of the used hadronic interaction models [10]. At the same time, its accompanying 𝑁 𝜇 is simultaneously recorded.…”
Section: Jinst 17 P06006mentioning
confidence: 99%