2009
DOI: 10.2165/00019053-200927050-00002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Cost and Impact of Health Conditions on Presenteeism to Employers

Abstract: Employers are becoming concerned with the costs of presenteeism in addition to the healthcare and absenteeism costs that have traditionally been explored. But what is the true impact of health conditions in terms of on-the-job productivity? This article examines the literature to assess the magnitude of presenteeism costs relative to total costs of a variety of health conditions. Searches of MEDLINE, CINAHL and PubMed were conducted in July 2008, with no starting date limitation, using 'presenteeism' or 'work … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

8
222
0
13

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 289 publications
(243 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
8
222
0
13
Order By: Relevance
“…This behavior is unlikely to benefit the physicians, their colleagues, or their patients. Presenteeism has been associated with negative personal outcomes, such as decreased general health (Aronsson et al, 2011;Bergström et al, 2009), depression (Conway et al, 2014), burnout (Miraglia & Johns, 2015;Thun et al, 2014), and future sickness absenteeism (Bergström et al, 2009;Gustafsson & Marklund, 2011;Hansen & Andersen, 2009), and with negative organizational outcomes such as decreased performance and productivity (Dellve et al, 2011;Hemp, 2004;Schultz et al, 2009). Presenteeism has also been identified as a risk factor for committing serious errors and safety violations (Niven & Ciborowska, 2015), and in disease transmission (Widera et al, 2010).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This behavior is unlikely to benefit the physicians, their colleagues, or their patients. Presenteeism has been associated with negative personal outcomes, such as decreased general health (Aronsson et al, 2011;Bergström et al, 2009), depression (Conway et al, 2014), burnout (Miraglia & Johns, 2015;Thun et al, 2014), and future sickness absenteeism (Bergström et al, 2009;Gustafsson & Marklund, 2011;Hansen & Andersen, 2009), and with negative organizational outcomes such as decreased performance and productivity (Dellve et al, 2011;Hemp, 2004;Schultz et al, 2009). Presenteeism has also been identified as a risk factor for committing serious errors and safety violations (Niven & Ciborowska, 2015), and in disease transmission (Widera et al, 2010).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As mentioned above, disease is one of the common factors. Workplace factors (perception of the working environment either as a positive or a negative place, daily "must-do tasks", replacement difficulties and tasks that need to be personally covered upon return, management-employee relations, support from peers, job insecurity and culture) and personal reasons (financial reasons, attitudes toward own health, work-life balance and family) often influence the decision of whether to come to work or not (6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13). Moreover, absenteeism and presenteeism are often inter-related.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sickness presenteeism due to acute illness (cold, flu, allergy, etc.) is sometimes more favorable to the employees because they have a choice of whether or not to attend work (8). When it comes to sickness presenteeism due to chronic condition (arthritis, back pain, mental health problems, etc.)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Only some instruments are able to translate presenteeism into time loss, and their estimates vary widely, for example, from 2 to 14 h over 2 weeks [11]. Thus, the results from studies using different instruments are not comparable and the exact cost amount cannot be determined at this time [12]. The main challenge of presenteeism measurement is the lack of a gold standard or objective measures to test its criterion validity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%