2022
DOI: 10.1002/joom.1221
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The cost of convenience: Ridehailing and traffic fatalities

Abstract: The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Bureau of Economic Research.NBER working papers are circulated for discussion and comment purposes. They have not been peer-reviewed or been subject to the review by the NBER Board of Directors that accompanies official NBER publications.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies suggest that ridesharing provides societal benefits such as increases in consumer surplus (Cohen et al, 2016), efficiency (Cachon et al, 2017), and less low-quality entrepreneurial activity (Burtch et al, 2018), but there is also evidence of detrimental effects like increased congestion and more accidents (Barrios et al, 2020), and privacy threats (Cheng et al, 2021). Thus, judgments concerning the benefits of ridesharing depend on the considered outcome and on the context where it takes place.…”
Section: Ridesharing and The Regulatory Voidmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies suggest that ridesharing provides societal benefits such as increases in consumer surplus (Cohen et al, 2016), efficiency (Cachon et al, 2017), and less low-quality entrepreneurial activity (Burtch et al, 2018), but there is also evidence of detrimental effects like increased congestion and more accidents (Barrios et al, 2020), and privacy threats (Cheng et al, 2021). Thus, judgments concerning the benefits of ridesharing depend on the considered outcome and on the context where it takes place.…”
Section: Ridesharing and The Regulatory Voidmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although Lyft is also present in the US market, Uber dominates the current market share (2). However, if we're being realistic, this system increases traffic and congestion, the Vehicle Kilometers Traveled (VKT) index, and the subsequent accidents when it takes the place of public transportation, notably traditional taxis (3).…”
Section: Introduction Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…attributed a 62% spike in average vehicle transport delays in San Francisco from 2010 to 2016, surpassing the counterfactual scenario of a mere 22% growth in the absence of TNCs. Tarduno (2021) leveraged a natural experiment arising from the abrupt suspension of Uber and Lyft services in Austin, Texas, estimating an average daily traffic speed reduction of 2.3%, coupled with annual congestion costs ranging between 33 and 52 million dollars Barrios et al (2023). linked the advent of TNCs with a 3% uptick in fatal accidents, impacting both vehicle occupants and pedestrians.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%