2020
DOI: 10.3390/nu12092787
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Cost of Diets According to Their Caloric Share of Ultraprocessed and Minimally Processed Foods in Belgium

Abstract: Background: This study estimated the monetary cost of diets with higher and lower caloric shares of ultraprocessed food products (UPF) and unprocessed/minimally processed foods (MPF) in Belgium for various sociodemographic groups. Methods: Data from the latest nationally representative Food Consumption Survey (FCS) 2014–2015 (n = 3146; 3–64 years) were used. Dietary data were collected through two nonconsecutive 24-hour recalls (food diaries for children). Average prices for >2000 food items (year 2014) wer… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0
5

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
20
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results that the recommended diet can be less expensive than the current diet also correspond to the findings of studies using methods other than Healthy Diets ASAP in the Northern Territory of Australia [26], throughout Australia [27], in New Zealand [28] and in Mexico [29]. While a systematic review [30] and two relevant studies [31,32] reported contradicting results, methodological differences in the contents of the items priced (for example, variation in inclusion/exclusion of alcoholic beverages and 'take-away' foods) and units of cost results (for example, by energy, weight, serve or nutrient density) render a comparison problematic [17]. This highlights the importance of 'anchoring' foods and drinks to be priced in total diets and using standardised methods to support cost comparison [16][17][18].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Our results that the recommended diet can be less expensive than the current diet also correspond to the findings of studies using methods other than Healthy Diets ASAP in the Northern Territory of Australia [26], throughout Australia [27], in New Zealand [28] and in Mexico [29]. While a systematic review [30] and two relevant studies [31,32] reported contradicting results, methodological differences in the contents of the items priced (for example, variation in inclusion/exclusion of alcoholic beverages and 'take-away' foods) and units of cost results (for example, by energy, weight, serve or nutrient density) render a comparison problematic [17]. This highlights the importance of 'anchoring' foods and drinks to be priced in total diets and using standardised methods to support cost comparison [16][17][18].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Regarding age, studies generally reported large variations amongst the age groups. However, UPF intake generally decreased with increasing age, with the highest levels of UPF intake observed in children and adolescents, and the lowest in older subjects [ 51 , 54 , 87 , 104 , 108 , 110 , 112 , 118 ] ( Table 3 ). Only five studies also stratified results based on body mass index (BMI) of the participants, generally finding a slight, but higher, UPF intake in subjects with the highest BMI (e.g., greater than 30 kg/m 2 ) [ 58 , 87 , 89 , 95 ] ( Table 4 ) [ 58 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Food policy initiatives to minimise consumption of UPF in the diet primarily include fiscal measures, which, however, should be accompanied by subsidies or incentives (such as VAT reduction for healthful foods) aimed at promoting purchase of healthier foods; indeed, diets rich in UPF are estimated to be cheaper than diets with a low inclusion of these products; thus, the economical affordability of minimally processed foods might be favourably improved (54) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%