Groups, Graphs and Random Walks 2017
DOI: 10.1017/9781316576571.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Cost of Distinguishing Graphs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If G is a locally finite graph with linear growth and v is a vertex in G then there is a constant k such that false|Sv(n)false|=k for infinitely many values of n . (This is observed by Boutin and Imrich in their paper [, Fact 2 in the proof of Proposition 13].) From this we deduce that the vertex‐degree of an end of G is at most equal to k , since each ray in G must pass through all but finitely many of the spheres Svfalse(nfalse).…”
Section: A Dichotomy Results For Automorphism Groupssupporting
confidence: 69%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…If G is a locally finite graph with linear growth and v is a vertex in G then there is a constant k such that false|Sv(n)false|=k for infinitely many values of n . (This is observed by Boutin and Imrich in their paper [, Fact 2 in the proof of Proposition 13].) From this we deduce that the vertex‐degree of an end of G is at most equal to k , since each ray in G must pass through all but finitely many of the spheres Svfalse(nfalse).…”
Section: A Dichotomy Results For Automorphism Groupssupporting
confidence: 69%
“…In particular a connected graph with linear growth and a countably infinite autormorphism group cannot have one end. Thus one can strengthen [, Theorem 22] and get: Theorem Every locally finite connected graph with linear growth and countably infinite automorphism group has 2 ends.…”
Section: A Dichotomy Results For Automorphism Groupsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Note that though Det(G) is a lower bound for Dist(G), it is not always a good lower bound. As seen in [6], the cost of 2-distinguishing can be an arbitrarily large multiple of the determining number.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%