2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10640-015-9935-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Cost of Mediterranean Sea Warming and Acidification: A Choice Experiment Among Scuba Divers at Medes Islands, Spain

Abstract: A choice experiment is undertaken to elicit preferences of scuba divers in the Marine Protected Area of Medes Islands (Spain). This is the first non-market valuation study of a typical Mediterranean habitat, the Coralligenous, which is characterized by high biodiversity, geomorphologic complexity and iconic species like gorgonians. This habitat is not only very attractive for scuba diving, but is also threatened by climate change and ocean acidification, which is our motivation for undertaking this valuation s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
25
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
3
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, losses in coral reef quality can have an array of impacts due to their prominent role in creating and protecting beaches, protecting coastal infrastructure, and providing aesthetic value for divers and snorkelers. attribute to clean and wide beaches, healthy reefs, diverse fish populations and encounters with species such as sea turtles [21][22][23], with similar results found outside the region [24][25][26].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…For example, losses in coral reef quality can have an array of impacts due to their prominent role in creating and protecting beaches, protecting coastal infrastructure, and providing aesthetic value for divers and snorkelers. attribute to clean and wide beaches, healthy reefs, diverse fish populations and encounters with species such as sea turtles [21][22][23], with similar results found outside the region [24][25][26].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Divers accessing MPAs may provide feedback on the appeal of the area (e.g. through their preferences, satisfaction and/or economic indicators: Giglio et al , ; Oliveira et al , ; Rees et al , ; Rodrigues et al , ), but also on the effectiveness of the implemented conservation measures, for example by reporting on the abundance of easily identifiable protected species. On the other hand, operators are ‘the people in the field’ and usually have a medium‐ or long‐term memory of their local environment, which makes them both important witnesses and ideal early‐warners of changes or anomalies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some reef stressors can, however, skew diver and snorkeler perception of coral reef health, which usually matches remarkably well ecological measures of integrity (Uyarra et al, 2005;Dinsdale, 2009;Gill et al, 2015;Haas et al, 2015;Rodrigues et al, 2015). This is the case of invasive species, which can change local species composition, alter ecosystem processes, and negatively affect ecosystem services (Andersen et al, 2004;Blackburn et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…This change can adversely impact non-extractive ecotourism activities, such as recreational snorkeling and diving, which depend on the "beauty" of coral reefs (Cesar et al, 2003;Charles and Dukes, 2007;Pejchar and Mooney, 2009), particularly in small-island states where tourism can generate up to 50% of gross domestic product (European Commission, 2002;Cesar et al, 2003). Environmental valuation methods have been used to assess the esthetic value of coral reefs and the socioeconomic impact of stressors on these systems (White et al, 2000;Brander et al, 2007;Rodrigues et al, 2015). Calculating tourist willingness-to-pay (WTP) for conservation management interventions on reefs is a common technique with which tourists are directly asked how much they would be willing to pay for a good (e.g., seeing a sea turtle on a dive; Depondt and Green, 2006;Casey et al, 2010;Emang et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%