2008
DOI: 10.1097/icu.0b013e3282fc239f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The cost of vision for vitreoretinal interventions

Abstract: Although improved understanding of basic, cellular processes has led to markedly improved treatment options for age-related macular degeneration within the past decade, the high costs and wide applicability threaten the balance and viability of the payor system. Accurate means of assessing cost-effectiveness are critical to defining clinical applications.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 46 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Pegaptanib was approved in 2004, use of bevacizumab for AMD began in 2005, and ranibizumab was approved in mid-2006. 3 Although several studies have evaluated the costeffectiveness of therapies for neovascular AMD, [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11] total costs and resource use associated with the condition are not well understood. Two reviews published in 2006 emphasized the need for additional research to quantify both the direct and indirect costs of AMD.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pegaptanib was approved in 2004, use of bevacizumab for AMD began in 2005, and ranibizumab was approved in mid-2006. 3 Although several studies have evaluated the costeffectiveness of therapies for neovascular AMD, [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11] total costs and resource use associated with the condition are not well understood. Two reviews published in 2006 emphasized the need for additional research to quantify both the direct and indirect costs of AMD.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%