2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2009.09.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The costs of caring: Gender identification increases threat following exposure to sexism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
45
2
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
4
45
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our study clarified the direction of their effects on life satisfaction. Previous studies on social identities have produced mixed findings, with some studies showing that they exert a protective role on psychological well-being (R. M. Lee, 2005), and others finding they are risk factors on mental health (Eliezer, Major, & Mendes, 2010). The results from our conditional mediation models may provide a framework that explains the conditions under which solidarity with one's in-group may act as a risk or protective factor.…”
Section: Strengths Of the Studymentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Our study clarified the direction of their effects on life satisfaction. Previous studies on social identities have produced mixed findings, with some studies showing that they exert a protective role on psychological well-being (R. M. Lee, 2005), and others finding they are risk factors on mental health (Eliezer, Major, & Mendes, 2010). The results from our conditional mediation models may provide a framework that explains the conditions under which solidarity with one's in-group may act as a risk or protective factor.…”
Section: Strengths Of the Studymentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Numerous studies have documented that perceived pervasive sexism and gender-based stereotype threat are related to lower self-esteem, greater psychological distress (e.g., anxiety, depression, etc. ), physiological stress, physical health problems, and poor performance (Branscombe, Kobryknowicz, Owen, & Schmitt, 2002; Dion, 1975; Eliezer, Major, & Mendes, 2010; Fischer & Holtz, 2007; Hunter, 1998; Logel, Walton, Spencer, Iserman, von Hippel, & Bell, 2009); McCoy & Major, 2003; Pascoe & Richman, 2009; Schmitt, Branscombe, & Postmes, 2003; Schmitt, Branscombe, Postmes, & Garcia, 2014; Swim, Hyers, Cohen, & Ferguson, 2001). Here, we examine one strategy that may promote resilience among women exposed to pervasive sexism – group affirmation.…”
Section: Perceived Sexism and Self-esteemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A BP sensor was applied, and participants were asked to sit quietly for a fi ve minute baseline measurement period. Following this baseline period, participants took part in an experimental session, the results of which are reported elsewhere (Eliezer, Major, & Mendes, 2010).…”
Section: Low Perceived Discriminationmentioning
confidence: 99%