2002
DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0706.2002.990116.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The costs of immunological challenge to developing mountain chickadees,Poecile gambeli,in the wild

Abstract: The tradeoff between immunocompetence and development in avian species could have long‐term consequences relating to fitness. This study investigated the developmental cost of mounting a humoral immune response in growing mountain chickadees, Poecile gambeli. We immunologically challenged nestling chickadees using nonpathogenic antigens of either Newcastle disease virus vaccine or sheep red blood cells. Body mass, tarsal length, haematocrit, total plasma protein, and survival did not vary significantly between… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Merino et al, 2000;Soler et al, 2003;Brommer, 2004), other studies failed to demonstrate the expected tradeoff (e.g. Hõrak et al, 2000;Whitaker and Fair, 2002). Here, we propose that this ambiguity stems from the lack of experimental control of the amount of resources traded between competing functions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Merino et al, 2000;Soler et al, 2003;Brommer, 2004), other studies failed to demonstrate the expected tradeoff (e.g. Hõrak et al, 2000;Whitaker and Fair, 2002). Here, we propose that this ambiguity stems from the lack of experimental control of the amount of resources traded between competing functions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Nestling CMI has been shown previously to be associated to nutritional state (Horãk et al 1999, Alonso‐Álvarez and Tella 2001) and hatching date (Sorci et al 1997). In some cases, it may be traded off against growth rate (Soler et al 2002, Whitaker and Fair 2002). It could be argued that the effect of date is a consequence of impaired nutrition as the season progresses, and therefore a consequence of the effect of body mass (but see Merino et al 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The findings of reduced body mass, mass gain or growth in response to non-pathological immune challenge have been documented in several avian studies (e.g. Klasing et al, 1987;Fair et al, 1999;Ots et al, 2001;Bonneaud et al, 2003) (but see Whitaker and Fair, 2002;Hõrak et al, 2000;. Possible mechanisms include energy reallocation from maintenance to immune function (reviewed by Lochmiller and Deerenberg, 2000;Demas and Sakaria, 2005) or inflammation-induced sickness syndrome, which results in reduced food intake and locomotory activity (e.g.…”
Section: Costs Of Immune Responsementioning
confidence: 98%