2018
DOI: 10.21144/wp18-03
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Costs of (sub)Sovereign Default Risk: Evidence from Puerto Rico

Abstract: Puerto Rico's unique characteristics as a U.S. territory allow us to examine the transmission of quasi-sovereign default risk to the real economy. We document a negative relationship between increased default probabilities and employment growth in government-demand-dependent industries. The negative relationship strengthens when the government undertakes austerity measures. In addition, fiscal austerity reduces output growth via a local fiscal multiplier effect. Overall, we provide evidence for a novel demand-… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result, firms which are ex-ante more financially constrained should also be positively affected by the inflows, as they could increase their leverage and profitability (Arellano et al, 2017). Further, by reducing government funding costs, sovereign inflows should in principle favor firms which are more closely connected to the domestic government, such as firms which are partially or totally owned by the government, or firms which rely more on government demand for their products (Chari et al, 2018). Thus, the first set of empirical implications which we test in this paper are: i) sovereign debt inflow shocks should positively affect domestic financial firms; ii) sovereign debt inflow shocks should positively affect firms facing greater financial constraints; iii) sovereign debt inflow shocks should positively affect government-related firms.…”
Section: Theoretical Background and Testable Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As a result, firms which are ex-ante more financially constrained should also be positively affected by the inflows, as they could increase their leverage and profitability (Arellano et al, 2017). Further, by reducing government funding costs, sovereign inflows should in principle favor firms which are more closely connected to the domestic government, such as firms which are partially or totally owned by the government, or firms which rely more on government demand for their products (Chari et al, 2018). Thus, the first set of empirical implications which we test in this paper are: i) sovereign debt inflow shocks should positively affect domestic financial firms; ii) sovereign debt inflow shocks should positively affect firms facing greater financial constraints; iii) sovereign debt inflow shocks should positively affect government-related firms.…”
Section: Theoretical Background and Testable Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 For instance, Hébert and Schreger (2017) estimates the cost of sovereign default for listed Argentinian companies exploiting legal rulings against Argentina. Similarly, Andrade and Chhaochharia (2018) and Chari et al (2018) analyze the costs of sovereign default (in Europe and Puerto Rico, respectively) and find that firms that are more closely related with the domestic government tend to be more sensitive to changes in the risk of default. 7 Altavilla et al (2017), andBottero et al (2020) also provide evidence which is consistent with this channel.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%