2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2019.119282
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The coupled evolution of mid- to late Holocene temperature and moisture in the southeast Qaidam Basin

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The biotic values (pollen and GDGTs) were also compared to abiotic parameters (climate, elevation, location and soil features) by the way of a redundancy analysis (RDA). The regression models were run with the p value < 0.05 (model relevance), the R 2 (correlation level between the variables), the root mean square deviation (RMSE, error on parameter reconstruction) and Akaike's information criterion (AIC, effect of over-parameterization on multiple regression models; Arnold, 2010;Symonds and Moussalli, 2011). A cross-validation test was performed for all the brGDGT calibrations (from this study and from the literature) using an independent set of six lacustrine samples from the lake MMNT5C12 top-core.…”
Section: Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The biotic values (pollen and GDGTs) were also compared to abiotic parameters (climate, elevation, location and soil features) by the way of a redundancy analysis (RDA). The regression models were run with the p value < 0.05 (model relevance), the R 2 (correlation level between the variables), the root mean square deviation (RMSE, error on parameter reconstruction) and Akaike's information criterion (AIC, effect of over-parameterization on multiple regression models; Arnold, 2010;Symonds and Moussalli, 2011). A cross-validation test was performed for all the brGDGT calibrations (from this study and from the literature) using an independent set of six lacustrine samples from the lake MMNT5C12 top-core.…”
Section: Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To test the reliability of our modern calibrations, we have finally selected two paleosequences close to the Mongolian plateau used as test-benches of the calibrations. For the pollen analysis, the core D3L6 from Unkelbach et al (2019) and located in the Mongolian Altai range is compared to the Xiangride section (XRD) used for brGDGT sequence from Sun et al (2019), sampled in the Chinese Qaidam Basin (Fig. 2).…”
Section: Coring Sampling Area and Sample Typesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ACA climate reconstruction for the 5000 year BP. (A): climate-pollen inferred for the Lake D3L6 (Unkelbach et al, 2019) comparing two transfer function methods (WAPLS and MAT) and the 4 databases (EAPDB, COSTDB, MDB and NMSDB) ; (B) climate-brGDGT inferred from the XRD section (Sun et al, 2019) comparing local (NMSDB) and global calibrations (De Jonge et al, 2014a;Naafs et al, 2017a, b). The climate periods correspond to Little Ice Age (LIA), Warm Medieval Period (WMP), Dark Ages Cold Period (DACP),…”
Section: Test-bench Of the Local Calibrations On Two Paleosequencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With the development of improved liquid chromatography separation methods, a series of 6‐methyl brGDGT isomers (i.e., IIa′, IIb′, IIc′, IIIa′, IIIb′, and IIIc′ with structures illustrated in Figure S1) have been identified that coeluted with 5‐methyl brGDGTs under earlier chromatographic methods and differ only in the carbon position of the methyl branches (C6 vs. C5 position) (De Jonge et al, 2013; De Jonge, Hopmans, et al, 2014; Hopmans et al, 2016; Yang et al, 2015). Their fractional abundances were observed to be correlated strongly with soil pH in worldwide distributed soils, thus leading to the development of new brGDGT‐based soil pH indicators (e.g., CBT′) (De Jonge, Hopmans, et al, 2014; Ding et al, 2015; Xiao et al, 2015), allowing for soil pH reconstructions in loess‐paleosol sequences (Duan et al, 2019; Sun et al, 2019). The newly defined methylation index based on only 5‐methyl brGDGTs (MBT′ 5ME ) shows a better correlation with MAAT compared to traditional MBT (MBT′)/CBT proxies both in China and globally (De Jonge, Hopmans, et al, 2014; Ding et al, 2015; Yang et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%