The coupling relationship between ecosystem services and residents' income and its impact factors: a case study of the Lashihai basin in Lijiang, Yunan

Lei, 胡蕾 Hu; Jian, 吴健 Wu; Haiping, 李海萍 Li

doi:10.5846/stxb201803300678

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In order to conduct coupling analysis between ecosystem services and residents’ well-being at a smaller unit scale and refer to relevant research literature ( Huang et al., 2019a ), this paper ultimately selected a 3 kilometer * 3 kilometer grid as the sample unit scale for coupling analysis). To reference relevant literature ( Hu et al., 2018 ; Liao et al., 2020 ; Maimaiti et al., 2022 ), this paper divides the coefficient of coordinated development into five grades from low to high, namely 0≤ D <0.2 severe disorder, 0.2≤ D <0.4 moderate disorder, 0.4≤ D <0.06 primary disorder, 0.6≤ D <0.8 moderate coordination and 0.8≤ D <1 excellent coordination.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Relevant research mainly conducts mutual analysis by constructing different service indicators, statistics, and livelihood or well-being indicators of questionnaires. The research methods mainly include matching statistics ( Suich et al., 2015 ), regression analysis ( Hu et al., 2018 ), coupling coordinated degree ( Pan et al., 2020 ) and perception questionnaire ( Yang et al., 2019 ; Marcinkevičiūtė et al., 2022 ; Xiong et al., 2022 ), etc. The above research has played a good role in complementing and promoting the understanding of the relationship between ecosystem services and human well-being at different space-time scales, but the impact mechanism, coupling model, ecological process of them still needs to be explored ( Zang and Zou, 2016 ; Zhao, 2017 ).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Evaluation of typical ecosystem services in Dabie Mountain area and its application in improving residents' well-being

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Research on ecosystem services and residents’ well-being in old revolutionary base areas is an important task for China’s ecological civilization construction and rural revitalization. Taking Jinzhai County, the core area of Dabie Mountains, China, as an example, based on InVEST model, the methods of spatial autocorrelation and coupling coordinated development degree, the spatiotemporal evolution, spatial heterogeneity and coupling association patterns of ecosystem services and multidimensional well-being in the study area from 2005 to 2020 were discussed. The major results are: In the past 15 years, in the core area of the Dabie Mountains, ecosystem services such as food supply, soil retention and water yield showed an upward trend, carbon sequestration and biodiversity maintenance showed a downward trend. The comprehensive index of multidimensional well-being in the core area of Dabie Mountain increased by 27.23% and the spatial difference in multidimensional well-being is gradually narrowing. By the analysis of coupling coordination, the number of units with the type of coupling disharmony between ecosystem services and multidimensional well-being in the study area decreased significantly from 56.85% in 2005 to 26.81% in 2020, respectively. The analysis of geographical detection showed that the habitat quality factor was the dominant controlling factor of coupling coordination spatial difference. By bivariate spatial autocorrelation analysis, in the past 15 years, the number of units with the “high ecology-high well-being” synergy type increased from 5.44% to 13.31%. The results can provide a reference for accurate identification, optimal regulation and synergistic improvement between ecosystem services and relative poverty in the Dabie Mountain area.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%