2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.01.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The course and prognostic factors of cognitive outcomes after traumatic brain injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
43
1
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 98 publications
2
43
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results show that TBI alone, or with SCI, differentially affects men and women of varying ages, with effect of severe TBI and concussions (e.g., unspecified injury severity S06.0 codes) decreasing with increasing age. Our results support the notion that the CNS is not a static entity and that its structure and function at the time of injury matters when it comes to reorganization of neural pathways in response to the damage [40] .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Our results show that TBI alone, or with SCI, differentially affects men and women of varying ages, with effect of severe TBI and concussions (e.g., unspecified injury severity S06.0 codes) decreasing with increasing age. Our results support the notion that the CNS is not a static entity and that its structure and function at the time of injury matters when it comes to reorganization of neural pathways in response to the damage [40] .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…These findings may have clinical value for a specific subgroup of patients, indicating the need for continual neurocognitive assessments and for seeking age-related changes including psychological (e.g., depression and anxiety) and medical (e.g., seizures, biomarkers, and neurodegenerative) mechanisms that may contribute to cognitive decline in chronic TBI. However, as the time since TBI progresses, the environmental, behavioral, structural, morphological, and physiological influences may become a scientific challenge in understanding the prognostic factors of cognitive outcomes (for review, see Mollayeva et al, 2019). The current findings suggest that premorbid relationship of education was a consistently significant predictor of the three neurocognitive trajectories, where individuals with a lower education (12 years or less) showed a trend in Reasoning decline after 5 years of brain trauma (e.g., see Figure 2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent review by Mollayeva et al (2019) indicated that age as a determinant of cognitive outcome is inconsistent. In the current study, age was not found to be a significant predictor of neurocognitive trajectories.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, often individuals with similar indicators of severity and early clinical trajectories experience different outcomes (Bigler et al, 2006;Lutkenhoff et al, 2019). Recovery and community reintegration is further complicated by a number of interacting premorbid, clinical, demographic, and genetic factors (Mollayeva et al, 2019).…”
Section: Leveraging Enigma To Address Challenges In Ams-tbi Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%