1985
DOI: 10.1007/bf02456759
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The craggs connector; a termination for cooper cable

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The implantable stimulator system (Figure 1A) includes (1) the IGS with the stimulation stage, the wirelessly chargeable battery, and the telecommunication module, (2) the flexible anchor to position two stimulating electrodes into the gastric wall and (3) the control box to charge and communicate with the IGS for control and adaptation of the implant parameters. The anchor body contains two stainless steel electrodes, held 1 cm apart, and is connected to the IGS with a cable ending with Craggs connectors (Finetech Medical LTD, UK) 32 . The anchor is intended to be placed in a less‐invasive way through single incision percutaneous access with a single step release, 33 with (1) the summarized procedure and (2) the tool illustrated in Figure 1B.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The implantable stimulator system (Figure 1A) includes (1) the IGS with the stimulation stage, the wirelessly chargeable battery, and the telecommunication module, (2) the flexible anchor to position two stimulating electrodes into the gastric wall and (3) the control box to charge and communicate with the IGS for control and adaptation of the implant parameters. The anchor body contains two stainless steel electrodes, held 1 cm apart, and is connected to the IGS with a cable ending with Craggs connectors (Finetech Medical LTD, UK) 32 . The anchor is intended to be placed in a less‐invasive way through single incision percutaneous access with a single step release, 33 with (1) the summarized procedure and (2) the tool illustrated in Figure 1B.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a particular trade-off between connector size and channel count. Neural electrode designs with 10's to 100's of electrode sites are common, while long term implantable connectors typically have fewer than 10 channels [1], [3], [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The connector mating surfaces, and connections to any cables or implants, must be protected from the moist, corrosive, environment of the body. Protection methods for implantable connectors include silicone encapsulation [4], epoxy encapsulation [5], acrylic embedding (as part of a head mounting) [6], compression sleeves [7], and metal-in-ceramic hermetic feedthroughs [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…long-term implantability, reusability and a high channel count. Pin and socket designs as the Craggs connector [7] and the in-line connector [1] perform well in implants for bladder control [8], anterior root stimulation [9] and other neuroprostheses [10]. However, upscaled to high channel counts this concept would take up too much volume.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%