The crash of the knowledge economy

Pagano, Ugo; Rossi, Maria Alessandra

doi:10.1093/cje/bep033

Cited by 69 publications

(39 citation statements)

References 13 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…ej., un 3% del pib) en ciencia abierta a todos los países miembros de la omc (Pagano, 2014). Como alternativa, la financiación de instituciones internacionales de conocimiento y de compra de patentes respaldadas internacionalmente puede ser parte del conjunto de instrumentos (Pagano y Rossi, 2009). Hay, por cierto, una escasez de soluciones de política creativas en este campo: la búsqueda de maneras de superar los efectos negativos de la excesiva privatización del conocimiento debería ser parte de la agenda de una economía política de la ciencia.…”

Section: Nueva Justificación De Una Política Científica Globalunclassified

Economía del conocimiento, crisis financiera y depresión

Pagano¹,

Rossi²

2017

ecoins

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Este artículo revisa una rama reciente de investigación que subraya que las actuales instituciones de la economía del conocimiento ponen en peligro la promesa de crecimiento y prosperidad que se atribuye al mayor uso del conocimiento. La privatización excesiva del conocimiento genera círculos viciosos y virtuosos de acumulación de propiedad intelectual e inversión en capital humano que se auto refuerzan y aumentan la desigualdad global. Las actuales instituciones de la economía global también reducen las oportunidades de inversión globales, una de las causas de la actual depresión global. Sin antídotos espontáneos contra esos fenómenos, la política económica y la científica deberían intentar corregir, en forma coordinada y global, el balance entre conocimiento público y privado.

show abstract

Section: Nueva Justificación De Una Política Científica Globalunclassified

Economía del conocimiento, crisis financiera y depresión

Pagano¹,

Rossi²

2017

ecoins

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This shift is not, however, without risk. Pagano and Rossi (2009) argue that the specific cause of the last economic crisis was the knowledge economy. These authors claim that the cause of the crisis lays in the monopoly of developed countries over intellectual rights.…”

Section: The Economic Paradigm Shift As a Premise For New Business Momentioning

confidence: 99%

Complexity Theory for a New Managerial Paradigm: A Research Framework

Dominici

Roblek

2016

Contributions to Management Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this work, we supply a theoretical framework of how organizations can embed complexity management and sustainable development into their policies and actions. The proposed framework may lead to a new management paradigm, attempting to link the main concepts of complexity theory, change management, knowledge management, sustainable development, and cybernetics. We highlight how the processes of organizational change have occurred as a result of the move to adapt to the changes in the various global and international business environments and how this transformation has led to the shift toward the present innovation economy. We also point how organizational change needs to deal with sustainability, so that the change may be consistent with present needs, without compromising the future.

show abstract

“…It has also been suggested that it has a deflationary bias and it also contributed to the contagion effects of the financial crisis. But Pagano and Rossi (2009) also argue that one of the causes of the present crisis are to be found in the present institutions of the global knowledge architecture, in particular the strengthening and globalisation of intellectual property rights (IPRs). They see the financial crisis as 'the crash of the knowledge economy' and suggest that this has occurred through firstly the signing of the TRIPs agreement and secondly through the progressive reduction of the role of institutions of open science, whose main role is the creation and diffusion of publicly available knowledge.…”

Section: Contradictions In the Global Development Trajectorymentioning

confidence: 99%

The global recession of 2009 in a long‐term development perspective

Gore

2010

J of Intl Development

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper argues that the global recession of 2009 marks the ending of a global development cycle which began in the early 1950s. The long-wave rhythm of production and prices in the global development cycle is generated by the life cycle of investment and innovation during a technological revolution, related changes in supply and demand for natural resources, and inertia and transformation in the socio-institutional framework within which development takes place. From this perspective, the global recession is interpreted as a blocked structural transition. Whilst failings in the financial system triggered the global financial crisis, that crisis and the recession are more deeply rooted in contradictions in the global development trajectory. A paradigm shift in development theory and practice is a crucial element of the socio-institutional transformation now necessary to re-boot the global development cycle. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

show abstract

The crash of the knowledge economy

Cited by 69 publications

References 13 publications

Economía del conocimiento, crisis financiera y depresión

Economía del conocimiento, crisis financiera y depresión

Complexity Theory for a New Managerial Paradigm: A Research Framework

The global recession of 2009 in a long‐term development perspective

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About