2012
DOI: 10.1007/s10761-012-0180-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Creation and Endurance of Memory and Place Among First Nations of Northwestern Ontario, Canada

Abstract: Examinations of rock art typically focus on acts of creation and compositional meaning, with little attention paid to the position of these created places in the palimpsest of history. As these sites endure, their recognition and importance within subsequent social developments, including memory and oral tradition, are both invented and reinvented as descendant populations become established or as new populations move in displacing or replacing the makers. This paper examines the ways in which oral histories o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 13 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among many ways of knowing the past, Indigenous community members ‘read’ ancestral places and landscapes for meaning and historicity (Boogaart, 2001; Cruikshank, 2005; Morphy, 1995). These readings take place in relation to artefacts (Colwell-Chanthaphonh and Ferguson, 2006; Mosley, 2010: 68), flora and fauna (Bradley, 2008; Rose, 1996), rock art (Brady et al., 2016; papers in Brady and Taçon, 2016; Norder, 2012), water and watercourses (Langton, 2008: 144–148), fossils (Smith, 2019: 62) and other physical features of the landscape (Alcock, 2002; Basso, 1996; Bradley, 2000; Cruikshank, 2005). Indigenous interpretations of subsurface archaeological and geomorphological features have received far less attention: these engagements are seldom reported and are under-theorised (but see Ballard, in press, 1998; David et al., 2012; Pauketat, 2008; see Jones, 2012; Moshenska, 2007, 2009 for non-Indigenous public interpretations of the subsurface).…”
Section: Imagining the Subsurfacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among many ways of knowing the past, Indigenous community members ‘read’ ancestral places and landscapes for meaning and historicity (Boogaart, 2001; Cruikshank, 2005; Morphy, 1995). These readings take place in relation to artefacts (Colwell-Chanthaphonh and Ferguson, 2006; Mosley, 2010: 68), flora and fauna (Bradley, 2008; Rose, 1996), rock art (Brady et al., 2016; papers in Brady and Taçon, 2016; Norder, 2012), water and watercourses (Langton, 2008: 144–148), fossils (Smith, 2019: 62) and other physical features of the landscape (Alcock, 2002; Basso, 1996; Bradley, 2000; Cruikshank, 2005). Indigenous interpretations of subsurface archaeological and geomorphological features have received far less attention: these engagements are seldom reported and are under-theorised (but see Ballard, in press, 1998; David et al., 2012; Pauketat, 2008; see Jones, 2012; Moshenska, 2007, 2009 for non-Indigenous public interpretations of the subsurface).…”
Section: Imagining the Subsurfacementioning
confidence: 99%