“…This is also a familiar critique from Russian intellectuals of the applicability of the term colonialism, Orientalism, or even imperialism to the Russian context (for a lively recent debate between Russian and Western scholars on this issue, see Grachev andRykin 2007, Morrison 2007). For a debate about the applicability of Orientalism, see Khalid 2000, Knight 2000and Todovora 2000; for authors that assume, as I do, its general applicability mutatis mutandis to the Caucasus, see Layton (1986Layton ( , 1992Layton ( , 1994Layton ( , 1997, Jersild (1999Jersild ( , 2002. Naturally, colonialism (like Orientalism and imperialism) is a term that, like essentially every other term of comparative analysis, eludes easy and unchanging definitions except by ostension, but consider how much more elusive than these is the invariant core of term "modernity," a term which is nearly always defined either extremely abstractly or by simple ostensive definition (a long list of things that seem to go together).…”