2010
DOI: 10.1177/1077800410371922
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Creation of Fiction to Share Other Truths and Different Viewpoints: A Creative Journey and an Interpretive Process

Abstract: This article explores and shares the creative journey and interpretive process I experienced when creating fiction as a qualitative researcher. I seek to accomplish three things: (a) to articulate the process of creation and interpretation; (b) to revisit the burgeoning literature that argues for the use of fiction and other poetic, artistic writing as useful contributions to scholarly research; and (c) to show how the creation of fiction can usefully show other truths and different viewpoints.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The vignette is offered with the intention of presenting the target's perspective of being bullied, and to illustrate what the target's social performances might be in response to that bullying. 1 While a full analysis of the value of fiction, creative nonfiction, and creative writing techniques to present scholarly research is also beyond the scope of this article, I can confirm that scholars have been doing this successfully for years (see, e.g., Caulley, 2008;Ellis & Bochner, 2003;Furman, Lietz, & Langer, 2006;Glesne, 1997;Gutkind, 2009;Harold, 2003;Ketelle, 2004;Spindler, 2008;Vickers, 2010bVickers, , 2011Whiteman & Phillips, 2006). Fictional and other creative writing contributions have much to offer, especially when the researcher has both lived and researched the phenomenon under review.…”
Section: A Constructed (Fictional) Vignettementioning
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The vignette is offered with the intention of presenting the target's perspective of being bullied, and to illustrate what the target's social performances might be in response to that bullying. 1 While a full analysis of the value of fiction, creative nonfiction, and creative writing techniques to present scholarly research is also beyond the scope of this article, I can confirm that scholars have been doing this successfully for years (see, e.g., Caulley, 2008;Ellis & Bochner, 2003;Furman, Lietz, & Langer, 2006;Glesne, 1997;Gutkind, 2009;Harold, 2003;Ketelle, 2004;Spindler, 2008;Vickers, 2010bVickers, , 2011Whiteman & Phillips, 2006). Fictional and other creative writing contributions have much to offer, especially when the researcher has both lived and researched the phenomenon under review.…”
Section: A Constructed (Fictional) Vignettementioning
confidence: 74%
“…noTe 1. Readers interested in learning more about how the construction and interpretation of such a vignette might be undertaken are directed to Vickers (2010bVickers ( , 2011. I thank an anonymous reviewer for sharing how the review of this manu-script evoked memories of having been bullied as a junior faculty member.…”
Section: The Costs Of Social Performancesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, this study adopts some of the methodological suggestions by Parry and Johnson (2007) and Vickers (2010), and elaborates on the author's understanding of the pig world. More specifically, it uses critical thinking and creativity, and relies on the consultation of scientific and fictional sources about pigs.…”
Section: Methodological Challenges When Exploring the Perspective Of mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Through opting for creative nonfiction, as supported by Gutkind and Fletcher (2008), we used what is known as “compression.” Compression involves combining multiple participant descriptions, situations, and experiences into a few characters to accurately and logically re/construct the narrative streams identified within the dataset. The purpose of creating individual characters to represent each narrative stream is to engage readers and resonate as “real” (Vickers, 2010). The dialogue between characters gives readers exposure to a familiar storied format to foster understanding of the lived experience of research participation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%