The Creeping Politicisation of the World Bank: The Case of Corruption

Abstract

This paper looks at the increasing politicisation of the World Bank through its work on corruption. Historically, the Bank's Articles of Agreement, which forbid it from involving itself in the politics of its recipient countries, have excluded work on corruption. In the 1990s, internal and external demands grew for the Bank to address the problem of corruption, despite earlier reticence. Much research done over the past decade, often commissioned by the Bank or done in‐house, has worked to turn corruption into an economic and social issue, rather than a political one, in order to conduct anti‐corruption work while evading accusations that it is violating this non‐political mandate. Now this pretence is gradually slipping away and the Bank is becoming overtly political, despite its Articles and a lack of international consensus that this is the direction in which it should be heading.

Political Trust, Corruption, and Ratings of the IMF and the World Bank

“…3 While some of these states have used IMF resources they have not used these resources under a conditional lending arrangement. 4 Many studies have questioned the World Bank's role in fighting corruption (Marquette 2004;Polzer 2001) and designing and implementing reforms in Africa (Harrison 2005 with a considerable number of citizens (but not a majority) awarding fewer than 5 out of 11 points. In the next section, we discuss the literature which attempts to explain variation in attitudes toward international economic organizations.…”

Present but not Powerful: Neoliberalism, the State, and Development in Vietnam

“…Instead, it represented an attempt to build a state capable of shoring up, among other things, global capitalism (McMichael, 2000). That it represents a more invasive form of neoliberalism can be seen in developments which saw the World Bank, and other agencies, become involved in a whole range of activities, including anti-corruption programmes, under the umbrella of governance programmes (Marquette, 2004).…”

Civic education for combating corruption: lessons from Hong Kong and the US for donor‐funded programmes in poor countries

“…This is part of the growing move towards more explicit involvement in politics by donors (see, e.g. Marquette, 2004). Civic education is not just instrumental in changing attitudes towards corruption and civic behaviour but is part of political indoctrination as well, as Hong Kong shows.…”