The Crippling Legacy of Monomanias in DSM-5

Sadler, John Z.

doi:10.1007/978-94-017-9765-8_9

Cited by 15 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 26 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Σε κάθε περίπτωση, διαγνώσεις χωρίς έγκυρες ουδούς πρέπει να αφαιρεθούν από τα ταξινομικά συστήματα, ή εναλλακτικά, πρέπει η κλινική εκτίμηση να ορίζεται ρητά ως πυρηνικός άξονας της διάγνωσης (Maj, 2014• McGuffin & Farmer, 2014. Γενετικές μελέτες και νευρο-απεικονιστικές έρευνες θεωρούνται απαραίτητες για την εξασφάλιση της εγκυρότητας, όπως και η ΧΡΙΣΤΟΠΟΥΛΟΥ, ΓΚΙΡΛΕΜΗ, ΑΠΟΣΤΟΛΙΔΟΥ, ΣΤΕΦΑΝΟΥ, ΚΟΥΤΟΥΜΑΤΣΙΩΤΗ, ΜΑΡΟΥΛΗ, ΦΩΤΕΙΝΟΥ, ΕΡΜΗΛΙΟΥ, ΚΟΥΤΡΙΑΣ, ΝΤΑΛΗ (2020) 210 διαφοροποίηση κλινικών και ερευνητικών κριτηρίων και η αποφυγή ορισμού μόνο συμπτωματικών διαταραχών 9 (McGuffin & Farmer 2014• Sadler, 2015.…”

Section: άλλες προτάσεις για το μέλλονunclassified

DSM-5: Επτά Χρόνια Μετά -Εξελίξεις Και Προκλήσεις Στην Ταξινόμηση Ψυχικών Διαταραχών

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The DSM-5, the fifth publication of the diagnostic system DSM (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders) has been a source of intense scientific interest and debate. The purpose of this article is to review the most important developments in this scientific dialogue during the seven years after the publication of the manual. To begin with, reference is briefly made to the development of the DSM-5 as well as to criticism and response to this criticism that immediately followed publication of the manual. Then, later developments regarding the DSM-5 are discussed, such as the focus on particular issues of concern as well as significant social and economic changes regarding contemporary classification systems. Research findings on the current use of diagnostic classification systems are also presented. Finally, particular areas of interest and concern regarding future classification, and new proposals as the Research Domain Criteria (RDoc) of the National Institute of Mental Health in the United States are discussed.

show abstract

Section: άλλες προτάσεις για το μέλλονunclassified

DSM-5: Επτά Χρόνια Μετά -Εξελίξεις Και Προκλήσεις Στην Ταξινόμηση Ψυχικών Διαταραχών

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This is reflected in passionate discussions about the introduction of disorders such as gaming disorder and compulsive sexual behavior disorder (CSBD) ( Fuss, Lemay, et al., 2019 ; Reed et al., 2022 ; Van Rooij et al., 2018 ). It has also led to ongoing debates about the diagnostic validity of single-symptom impulse control disorders such as intermittent explosive disorder, kleptomania, and pyromania ( Sadler, 2015 ). Despite these conceptual criticisms, it has become increasingly clear in recent years that impulse control disorders and behavioral addictions are relevant for public health either because they are prevalent conditions and represent a significant burden for those affected (e.g., CSBD, gambling disorder, gaming disorder, intermittent explosive disorder), or because they have important forensic implications (e.g., pyromania, kleptomania, intermittent explosive disorder) ( Grant et al., 2014 ; McLaughlin et al., 2012 ; Morasco et al., 2006 ; Stevens, Dorstyn, Delfabbro, & King, 2021 ).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Mental health professionals' use of the ICD-11 classification of impulse control disorders and behavioral addictions: An international field study

Fuss,

Keeley,

Stein

et al. 2024

JBA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background and aimsThe ICD-11 chapter on mental, behavioral and neurodevelopmental disorders contains new controversial diagnoses including compulsive sexual behavior disorder (CSBD), intermittent explosive disorder (IED) and gaming disorder. Using a vignette-based methodology, this field study examined the ability of mental health professionals (MHPs) to apply the new ICD-11 diagnostic requirements for impulse control disorders, which include CSBD and IED, and disorders due to addictive behaviors, which include gaming disorder, compared to the previous ICD-10 guidelines.MethodsAcross eleven comparisons, members of the WHO's Global Clinical Practice Network (N = 1,090) evaluated standardized case descriptions that were designed to test key differences between the diagnostic guidelines of ICD-11 and ICD-10.ResultsThe ICD-11 outperformed the ICD-10 in the accuracy of diagnosing impulse control disorders and behavioral addictions in most comparisons, while the ICD-10 was not superior in any. The superiority of the ICD-11 was particularly clear where new diagnoses had been added to the classification system or major revisions had been made. However, the ICD-11 outperformed the ICD-10 only in a minority of comparisons in which mental health professionals were asked to evaluate cases with non-pathological high involvement in rewarding behaviors.Discussion and ConclusionsOverall, the present study indicates that the ICD-11 diagnostic requirements represent an improvement over the ICD-10 guidelines. However, additional efforts, such as training programs for MHPs and possible refinements of diagnostic guidance, are needed to avoid over-diagnosis of people who are highly engaged in a repetitive and rewarding behavior but below the threshold for a disorder.

show abstract

“…Exemplary is the work of Mavromatis, a psychiatrist who dedicates attention to the history of pyromania and notes that different beliefs were held on pyromania and legal insanity in different countries as well as in different historical contexts (Mavromatis, 2000;Mavromatis & Lion, 1977). In a recent article, Sadler (2015) describes the historical concept of monomania, including pyromania, and its legacy for the current DSM-5. Nanayakkara, Ogloff, and Thomas (2015) focus on the mental disorders that have been empirically associated with firesetting, starting with a historical account of pyromania emphasizing the controversies regarding this diagnosis and the views on pathological firesetting.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Pyromania in court: Legal insanity versus culpability in Western Europe and the Netherlands (1800–1950)

Dalhuisen

2018

International Journal of Law and Psychiatry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Crippling Legacy of Monomanias in DSM-5

Cited by 15 publications

References 26 publications

DSM-5: Επτά Χρόνια Μετά -Εξελίξεις Και Προκλήσεις Στην Ταξινόμηση Ψυχικών Διαταραχών

DSM-5: Επτά Χρόνια Μετά -Εξελίξεις Και Προκλήσεις Στην Ταξινόμηση Ψυχικών Διαταραχών

Mental health professionals' use of the ICD-11 classification of impulse control disorders and behavioral addictions: An international field study

Pyromania in court: Legal insanity versus culpability in Western Europe and the Netherlands (1800–1950)

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About