2021
DOI: 10.1080/07388551.2021.1983516
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The CRISPR toolbox for the gram-positive model bacterium Bacillus subtilis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In B. subtilis , different types of CRISPR‐Cas9‐based systems have been established according to the deployment strategies of Cas9, sgRNA and editing templates. Hong et al ( 2018 ) briefly reviewed a similar concept, and the employed plasmids and details were updated by Zocca et al ( 2021 ). With several options available, it is still critical to pay attention to specific experimental goals to choose the most suitable strategy.…”
Section: Effects Of Crispr Components On Genome Engineering Efficienc...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In B. subtilis , different types of CRISPR‐Cas9‐based systems have been established according to the deployment strategies of Cas9, sgRNA and editing templates. Hong et al ( 2018 ) briefly reviewed a similar concept, and the employed plasmids and details were updated by Zocca et al ( 2021 ). With several options available, it is still critical to pay attention to specific experimental goals to choose the most suitable strategy.…”
Section: Effects Of Crispr Components On Genome Engineering Efficienc...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When describing the different CRISPR systems, the editing efficiencies of gene knockout, knockin or mutation were lightly sketched by Zocca et al ( 2021 ). In this review, we analyse the possible influencing factors and compare the editing efficiencies of different engineering methods.…”
Section: The Efficiency Of Different Gene Editing and Possible Influe...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Bacillus subtilis has been utilized extensively in commercial enzyme production. Bacillus subtilis possesses a number of advantages, including nonpathogenicity, suitability for large-scale fermentation, and a diverse toolkit for genetic manipulation [ 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 ]. In addition, various signal peptides and promoters can be used to achieve effective heterologous protein expression in Bacillus subtilis [ 16 , 21 , 22 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our current knowledge about CRISPR-mediated genome editing in bacteria mainly come from a number of human pathogens as well as industrial and laboratory strains, such as Escherichia coli [810], Pseudomonas [11, 12], Mycobacterium [13], Bacillus [14, 15], Corynebacterium [16], Clostridium [17], Streptomyces [18], etc . Generally speaking, the type II CRISPR/Cas9 system[19] is the most widely-used heterologous genome editor in various bacterial strains due to its robust nuclease activity and broad compatibility with other functional proteins (i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%