1964
DOI: 10.1021/j100791a510
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Critical Surface Tension of Glass

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

1973
1973
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The magnitude of W reflects the propensity of the two materials to form an adhesive contact. Assuming that the fused silica probe and flat Teflon AF surfaces are smooth and considering the surface energies of fused silica and Teflon AF as 75 and 15.7 mJ m −2 ,13, 21 respectively, the theoretical pull‐off force for the flat surface would be ∼0.8 mN, which is much higher than that measured experimentally (0.23 ± 0.17 mN). The deviations of the measured pull‐off forces from the theoretical values calculated by JKR theory suggest that the short‐range universal van der Waals attractions in our system are limited.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…The magnitude of W reflects the propensity of the two materials to form an adhesive contact. Assuming that the fused silica probe and flat Teflon AF surfaces are smooth and considering the surface energies of fused silica and Teflon AF as 75 and 15.7 mJ m −2 ,13, 21 respectively, the theoretical pull‐off force for the flat surface would be ∼0.8 mN, which is much higher than that measured experimentally (0.23 ± 0.17 mN). The deviations of the measured pull‐off forces from the theoretical values calculated by JKR theory suggest that the short‐range universal van der Waals attractions in our system are limited.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…The adhesion force generated by van der Waals forces can also be predicted by the Johnson-Kendall-Roberts (JKR) model which considers only the presence of short-range van der Waals interactions within the area of contact. 47 According to this theory, the pull-off force (F) detected upon detaching two surfaces is independent of the applied preload and can be calculated by F ¼ À0.75pd 0 Dg, 47 where Dg z g 1 + g 2 À (g 1 Â g 2 ) 1/2 while g 1 and g 2 are the surface energies of fused silica (75 mJ m À2 ) 48 and Teon AF (15.7 mJ m À2 ), 26 respectively. Hence, according to the JKR model, for a hemispherical fused silica probe (8 mm in diameter) in contact with Teon AF, the pull-off force of 1.06 mN is attainable, which is fairly close to that predicted by calculating the Hamaker constant (i.e., 1.14 mN).…”
Section: Adhesion and Friction Of Double-level Nanopillarsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This result is stabilized by FTIR-spectroscopic measurements using the ATR-technique because such interactions could not be proved by this method [14]. According to other papers [15,16] a water film is adsorbed on the quartz surface which cannot be displaced by fatty acids. Just on quartz supports a perfect transfer of both types of monolayers can be achieved without difficulties (transfer ratio 1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%