2015
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-444-63369-9.00016-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Critical Zone of Coastal Barrier Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Dune ridge sites are explored with panels B and D and show the response of the relative high points within this study area. Low‐lying areas are shown with panels A, C and E representing relatively sheltered areas of accumulation characterised by increased moisture, humus and organic surface deposits and generally different vegetation community than adjacent higher areas (Barrineau et al, 2015). Additionally, panels A and D show North and South facing slopes that have been shown to have differential regrowth patterns in post‐fire dune landscapes (Cowling & Pierce, 1988; Vestergaard & Hastings, 2001).…”
Section: Study Sitesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dune ridge sites are explored with panels B and D and show the response of the relative high points within this study area. Low‐lying areas are shown with panels A, C and E representing relatively sheltered areas of accumulation characterised by increased moisture, humus and organic surface deposits and generally different vegetation community than adjacent higher areas (Barrineau et al, 2015). Additionally, panels A and D show North and South facing slopes that have been shown to have differential regrowth patterns in post‐fire dune landscapes (Cowling & Pierce, 1988; Vestergaard & Hastings, 2001).…”
Section: Study Sitesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The negative association of index value and increasing sand percentage per pixel in Figure 10 shows that all severity values decrease as the percentage of sand per pixel increases. Figure 11 demonstrates the resulting effects of soil brightness on index value within site D. Interdune swales are low points in dune landscapes that are more sheltered environments, characterised by increased moisture, higher humus and organic surface deposits, lower wind areas, accumulation and trapping of surface water, and commonly, a different vegetation community than in adjacent higher areas, often resulting in darker soils [111]. The canopy loss is uniform within this area according to the high-resolution aerial imagery, suggesting very high severity throughout site D. The darker soils located within the interdune swale have substantially higher index values in both NBR (Figure 11) indices, contrasted to the more consistent rating of fire severity from dDI that aligns with full canopy consumption.…”
Section: Comparison With Aerial Fire Severitymentioning
confidence: 99%