2004
DOI: 10.1080/15235882.2004.10162609
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Cross-Language Transfer of Phonological Skills of Hispanic Head Start Children

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
66
2
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 121 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
3
66
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies of transfer of reading skills between alphabetic languages have shown a range of correlations, from R2 = .15 to .71 (Carrell, 1991;Dufva & Voeten, 1999;Jiang & Kuehn, 2001;Lopez & Greenfield, 2004;Sparks et al, 2008;van Gelderen et al, 2007), with the highest correlation between Dutch and English, two closely related languages. The correlation found in the current study (R2 = .606) is thus higher than that found in most studies of transfer across alphabetic languages and higher than those found in previous studies of transfer between Chinese and English reading, R2 = ranged from .01 to .53, p < .05 Bialystok, McBride-Chang, et al, 2005;Keung & Ho, 2009;Wang et al, 2005;Wang et al, 2006), although those studies generally examined one specific component of reading skill rather than overall reading performance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Studies of transfer of reading skills between alphabetic languages have shown a range of correlations, from R2 = .15 to .71 (Carrell, 1991;Dufva & Voeten, 1999;Jiang & Kuehn, 2001;Lopez & Greenfield, 2004;Sparks et al, 2008;van Gelderen et al, 2007), with the highest correlation between Dutch and English, two closely related languages. The correlation found in the current study (R2 = .606) is thus higher than that found in most studies of transfer across alphabetic languages and higher than those found in previous studies of transfer between Chinese and English reading, R2 = ranged from .01 to .53, p < .05 Bialystok, McBride-Chang, et al, 2005;Keung & Ho, 2009;Wang et al, 2005;Wang et al, 2006), although those studies generally examined one specific component of reading skill rather than overall reading performance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The transfer of reading skills and abilities across a variety of alphabetic languages has been extensively examined, and the results are highly consistent with the LIH. Studies in Spanish-English transfer showed that higher reading skills and abilities from L1 had a slightly easier conversion to L2 reading (Carrell, 1991;Jiang & Kuehn, 2001;Lopez & Greenfield, 2004) with the range of r2 from .15 to .35, p < .05. The relationship occurs not only between Spanish and English but also in other alphabetic languages (L1) to English (L2): Finnish-English (e.g., r2 = .41, p < .01; Dufva & Voeten, 1999), Hmong-English (e.g., r2 = .15, p < .05; Jiang & Kuehn, 2001), Russian-English (e.g., r2 = .15, p < .05; Jiang & Kuehn, 2001), and DutchEnglish (e.g., r2 = .71, p = .014; van Gelderen, Schoonen, Stoel, de Glopper, & Hulstijn, 2007).…”
Section: Cross-language Transfer In Reading Abilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Results of empirical studies have shown that bilingual children may develop superior metalinguistic skills, that is, abilities to recognize, access, and manipulate components of words such as syllables, onsets, rimes, and segments that serve them well when learning to read, at least in related languages (Bialystok, 1986a(Bialystok, , 1986b(Bialystok, , 1988(Bialystok, , 1991Bialystok, Majumder, & Martin, 2003;Cromdal, 1999;López & Greenfield, 2004).…”
Section: Research On Inside-out Factors With Bilingual Childrenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The particulars of this research are beyond the scope of this paper but are thoroughly summarized by Sun-Alperin (2007). Nevertheless, a broad range of existing and emergent research does tend to support consistently positive relationships between language ability in L1 and phonological awareness development in L2 (Dickinson, McCabe, ClarkChiarelli, & Wolf, 2004;Hancin-Bhatt, 2008;Lopez & Greenfield, 2004;SunAlperin). Especially notable is the study by Dickinson and colleagues which found that receptive vocabulary (words that are recognized upon sight) is strongly related to phonological awareness (the ability to distinguish units of speech, such as words, syllables, and phonemes) within and across languages, even among L1 students identified as at-risk for successful literacy acquisition.…”
Section: Teachers' Emergent and Differentiated Perspectives: Bi-litermentioning
confidence: 99%