2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.01.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The crowding-out effects of tobacco and alcohol where expenditure shares are low: Analyzing expenditure data for Taiwan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
41
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
5
41
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We found that spending on tobacco crowds out expenditures on education and clothing for rural and urban households and expenditures on food for low- and middle-income households. Similar results have been found in other low- and middle-income countries such as India,10 China,17 18 Indonesia19 and Taiwan 20…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…We found that spending on tobacco crowds out expenditures on education and clothing for rural and urban households and expenditures on food for low- and middle-income households. Similar results have been found in other low- and middle-income countries such as India,10 China,17 18 Indonesia19 and Taiwan 20…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…However, most of the studies investigating the crowding-out effects of tobacco expenditures assert that tobacco money crowds out expenditures on food and other basic needs. 8,11–13 Behavioral changes associated with individuals’ quitting tobacco use and their effects on household consumption patterns would be important to understand, and future studies are needed to address these issues. Further research on households’ responses to having increased money because of individual household members’ quitting tobacco use could inform better study design.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Published reports on the nexus between tobacco use and nutrition have found that households divert a significant amount of scarce income to tobacco products, 6–10 crowding out expenditure on basic needs, such as food, health, and education. 8,11–13 This diversion of funds, in turn, exacerbates the effects of poverty, including the nutritional status of children. 14–19 An earlier study by Efroymson et al 6 reported that the average male cigarette smoker in Bangladesh spent more than twice as much on cigarettes as the per capita expenditure on clothing, housing, health, and education combined; that a typical poor smoker could add more than 500 calories to the diet of 1 or 2 children by eliminating his or her daily tobacco expenditure; and that an estimated 10.5 million malnourished people could have an adequate diet if money on tobacco were spent on food instead.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sivakumar & Bhat (2002), as well as, Ye & Pendyala (2005) develop and explore the FMNL, whileboth Mullahy & Robert (2010) and Mullahy (2010) have considered some very interesting aspects of the performance of these models. The applications of the fractional multinomial logit model have considered time use in the household, household transport time, statewide commodity flows and portfolio allocations, to date, the model has not been applied to household budget share analysis, although Pu, Lan, Chou & Lan (2008) estimate a bivariate fractional logit model, equation by equation, in their analysis of tobacco substitution effects.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%