2015
DOI: 10.1126/science.1261470
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The crucial role of surface magnetic fields for the solar dynamo

Abstract: The basic concept for the large-scale solar dynamo involves a cycle during which the poloidal field and the toroidal field are mutually generated by one another (1, 2). The winding of the poloidal field by differential rotation creates a toroidal field. A reversed poloidal field results from the formation of magnetic loops in the toroidal field, which become twisted by the Coriolis force due to solar rotation. In turn, the reversed poloidal field then becomes the source of a reversed toroidal field. In this wa… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
99
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 145 publications
(111 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
11
99
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…If the weakness of Cycle 24 continues in the declining phase, only weak poleward surges may result and hence a weaker Cycle 25 is expected. These inferences are based on the expectation from the BabcockLeighton model of solar cycles in that the polar field strength of one cycle determines the phase and amplitude of the next cycle (Babcock 1961;Leighton 1964;Wang & Sheeley 2009;Muñoz-Jaramillo et al 2013;Cameron & Schüssler 2015;Jiang et al 2015). Note that we are mainly talking about the cycle onset, while the precursor method usually predicts the maximum sunspot number in the next cycle and its epoch (Hathaway 2015 and references therein).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the weakness of Cycle 24 continues in the declining phase, only weak poleward surges may result and hence a weaker Cycle 25 is expected. These inferences are based on the expectation from the BabcockLeighton model of solar cycles in that the polar field strength of one cycle determines the phase and amplitude of the next cycle (Babcock 1961;Leighton 1964;Wang & Sheeley 2009;Muñoz-Jaramillo et al 2013;Cameron & Schüssler 2015;Jiang et al 2015). Note that we are mainly talking about the cycle onset, while the precursor method usually predicts the maximum sunspot number in the next cycle and its epoch (Hathaway 2015 and references therein).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cosmic ray variability was calculated in terms of the heliospheric modulation potential (see definitions and formalism in Usoskin et al 2005), also considering α-particles and heavier species of cosmic rays (Webber & Higbie 2009). This modulation potential was furthermore converted into decadal (solar-cycle averaged) sunspot number through the open solar magnetic flux model (Solanki et al 2000;Krivova et al 2007), which relates the solar surface magnetic cycle to the emerging magnetic flux (Cameron & Schüssler 2015). We note that the overall reconstruction method used here is similar to that previously used by Usoskin et al (2014).…”
Section: Reconstructing the Solar Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Essentially, we refer to a few properties of the Babcock-Leighton phenomenological model. In choosing that model we base ourselves also on Muñoz-Jaramillo et al (2013a, 2013b, Cameron and Schüssler (2015) and Petrie (2015) who find that this model well covers the observational data.…”
Section: The Tachocline; the Origin Of Sunspotsmentioning
confidence: 99%