1963
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3476(63)80042-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The cry latencies of normal infants and those with brain damage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

1966
1966
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the normal cry is not restored after nutritional therapy (Donzelli et al, 1994), the altered cry characteristics have been interpreted as an enduring consequence of CNS damage. This idea is compelling since various forms of brain damage, including asphyxia (Michelsson, 1971;Michelsson, Sirviö, & Wasz-Hockert, 1977a), bacterial meningitis (Michelsson, Sirviö, & Wasz-Hockert, 1977b), Down syndrome (Fisichelli & Karelitz, 1963;Karelitz & Fisichelli, 1962), and congenital hypothyroidism (Michelsson & Sirviö, 1976) have been found to produce differences in the cries of the infant.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the normal cry is not restored after nutritional therapy (Donzelli et al, 1994), the altered cry characteristics have been interpreted as an enduring consequence of CNS damage. This idea is compelling since various forms of brain damage, including asphyxia (Michelsson, 1971;Michelsson, Sirviö, & Wasz-Hockert, 1977a), bacterial meningitis (Michelsson, Sirviö, & Wasz-Hockert, 1977b), Down syndrome (Fisichelli & Karelitz, 1963;Karelitz & Fisichelli, 1962), and congenital hypothyroidism (Michelsson & Sirviö, 1976) have been found to produce differences in the cries of the infant.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The general time features were partly inspired by the Finnish work, but mainly by comparable measurements from studies by the American team headed by Karelitz and Fisichelli (Fisichelli & Karelitz, 1963, 1969Fisichelli el al., 1966). The individual time features, on the contrary, were mainly drawn from the Finnish work, lead by Wasz-Hockert and Michelsson (Sirvio and Michelsson, 1976;Michelsson, 1980;Thoden & Koivisto, 1980).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to different authors, the latency period is from 0.6 to 3.6 sec (5,15,37). This can be accounted for partly by measuring techniques, partly by the infant's wakefulness but it is also due to the fact that the latency period is not quite uniform in healthy neonates.…”
Section: Crying O F Healthy Newborn Infantsmentioning
confidence: 99%