“…The other compounds in the series ( 2 – 9 ) were selected to cover several structural features such as isomeric nature ( 1 , 2 ), cage boron, and carbon substitutions by polar and nonpolar groups ( 3 to 6 versus 9 ) or by a diatomic and monoatomic bridge that partly and completely hinders movement of the ligand planes around the metal atom. The compounds were synthesized by procedures known for [(1,7-C 2 B 9 H 11 ) 2 -2,2′-Co]Cs ( 2 ), [(1,2-Me 2 -1,2-C 2 B 9 H 9 ) 2 -3,3′-Co]Cs ( 3 ), [(8,8′-Cl 2 -(1,2-C 2 B 9 H 10 ) 2 -3,3′-Co]Cs ( 4 ), [(8-l-1,2-C 2 B 9 H 10 )(1′,2′-C 2 B 9 H 11 )-3,3′-Co]Cs ( 5 ), [(8,8′-l 2 -(1,2-C 2 B 9 H 10 ) 2 -3,3′-Co]Cs ( 6 ), , [(8,8′-μ-O-(1,2-C 2 B 9 H 10 ) 2 -3,3′-Co]Cs ( 7 ), , [(8,8′-μ-(O-CH 2 )-(1,2-C 2 B 9 H 10 ) 2 -3,3′-Co]Cs ( 8 ), and [(1-HOC 2 H 4 -1,2-C 2 B 9 H 10 )(1′,2′-C 2 B 9 H 11 )-3,3′-Co]Cs ( 9 ) Their identity was examined by 11 B and 1 H NMR spectroscopies and mass spectrometry (MS); the values of the NMR shifts and MS base mass peaks were found to correspond to the reported data. The purity assay of all compounds was performed by high-performance liquid chromatography with a diode-array detector, according to the previously published IP-RP method. , …”