1976
DOI: 10.1107/s0567740876006110
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The crystal and molecular structure of bis[dihydrobis(1-pyrazolyl)borato]nickel(II): evidence for the absence of Ni–H interaction in polypyrazolyl borates of nickel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the original criteria of Brookhart and Green, agostic interactions would be present in 1 but clearly absent in 2 , as the latter compound displays a pronounced δ( 1 H) downfield shift in the case of the Ni⋅⋅⋅HC coordinating methylene protons. This conclusion is also in accord with the structural study of 2 by Echols and Dennis in 1974, who concluded that steric restrictions dictate the conformation of the molecule, not an interaction of Ni with an apical H atom of one of the methylene groups of the pyrazolylborato ligand 1b. 12 A subsequent extended Hückel theory (EHT) study by Saillard and Hoffmann (SH)1c gave further evidence that the interaction between an axially approaching HC ligand (for example, CH 4 ), and the d 8 ‐ML 4 metal fragment might be actually even repulsive owing to the presence of a fully occupied and axially oriented M(d italicz 2) orbital (Scheme ) 1c.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…According to the original criteria of Brookhart and Green, agostic interactions would be present in 1 but clearly absent in 2 , as the latter compound displays a pronounced δ( 1 H) downfield shift in the case of the Ni⋅⋅⋅HC coordinating methylene protons. This conclusion is also in accord with the structural study of 2 by Echols and Dennis in 1974, who concluded that steric restrictions dictate the conformation of the molecule, not an interaction of Ni with an apical H atom of one of the methylene groups of the pyrazolylborato ligand 1b. 12 A subsequent extended Hückel theory (EHT) study by Saillard and Hoffmann (SH)1c gave further evidence that the interaction between an axially approaching HC ligand (for example, CH 4 ), and the d 8 ‐ML 4 metal fragment might be actually even repulsive owing to the presence of a fully occupied and axially oriented M(d italicz 2) orbital (Scheme ) 1c.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Where C–H bond hydrogen atoms make close approaches to transition‐metal centres above the coordination plane in square‐planar d 8 complexes, the nature of any interaction present is of interest. The term originally used for this type of interaction is “anagostic”, in which repulsive forces were deemed to be operating , . However, as already mentioned, it has been recognised that some covalency can be involved leading to a “preagostic” situation, whereby weak attraction is apparent in the form of metal to C–Hσ* back‐donation and, similarly, C–Hσ to metal‐based orbital donation (agostic donation) .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[21] Such a situation is represented in Scheme 1 for b-hydrogen elimination or its reverse, alkene insertion into a MÀH bond. This scenario was first discussed for [EtTiCl 3 (dmpe)] (11). [146] Green et al concluded that in 11 "the ethyl group models a stage about half-way along the reaction coordinate for a b-elimination reaction".…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…[15] Trofimenko subsequently played a pivotal role in the investigation of these M···HC interactions in transition-metal systems throughout the early 1970s, and provided samples of [Ni{H 2 B(pz) 2 } 2 ] (7; pz = C 3 N 2 H 3 ) and [Mo{Et 2 B(pz) 2 }(h 3 -C 3 H 4 Ph)(CO) 2 ] (8, Figure 1) to Cotton and Echols, who determined their structures by single-crystal X-ray diffraction and NMR spectroscopy, and reported the presence of such interactions in 8 and their absence in 7. [10,11] By analogy to bonding concepts in borane chemistry, Cotton classified the interaction in 8 as "a three-center, twoelectron bond encompassing the C···H···Mo atoms" [10a] and drew comparisons with the concept in organolithium chemistry accounting for "three-center bonds of the form C···H···Li". [4] Around the same time, Maitlis et al discovered an interaction between the palladium center and the d-CÀH bond in trans-[Pd(CMeCMeCMeCMeH)Br(PPh 3 ) 2 ] (9; Figure 1) and concluded "This type of interaction has not been observed before, though Trofimenko noted that the methylene hydrogens of the ethyl groups in [Ni{Et 2 B(pz) 2 } 2 ] are shifted downfield".…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%