The photochemical reaction of Mn(CO)5Br with PCy3 in toluene proceeds with the fast
evolution of CO. The complex formed, MnBr(CO)3(PCy3)2, 1, readily reacts with NaA (A =
B[C6H3(3,5-CF3)2]4) to form the dark green salt [Mn(CO)3(PCy3)2][A], 2, which has an agostic
interaction of a cyclohexyl C−H with manganese. The light yellow η2-H2 complex, [Mn(H2)(CO)3(PCy3)2][A], 3, forms at room temperature by placing solutions of 2 under 1 atm of H2.
The H2 ligand is labile and readily dissociates when the H2 atmosphere is removed in vacuo.
31P NMR clearly shows that at 25 °C under 1 atm of H2, 3 exists in equilibrium with 2. At
−78 °C and under <1 atm of H2, only 3 is observed. The synthesis of the new tricarbonyl
complex [Mn(CO)3(PCy3)2]+ provides an excellent system of comparison for the binding of
small molecules to similar known 16e fragments such as M(CO)3(PCy3)2 (M = Cr, Mo, W,
Re+) and M(CO)(dppe)2 (M = Mo, Mn+). The cationic manganese complex 2 appears to give
somewhat more stable binding of H2 than the isoelectronic neutral chromium congener, which
would not have been expected on the basis of relative back-bonding ability of the metal
centers. Thus it is clear that increased σ-donation more than compensates for decreased
back-bonding in the relative metal−H2 bonding energies. Surprisingly, binding of N2,
ethylene, or silanes to 2 was not observed in solution even at low temperature and SO2
binds only weakly. By comparison with other similar systems, it is clear that H2 becomes
an increasingly better ligand than N2 as the electrophilicity of the metal increases. Thus
nonclassical H2 is a more versatile ligand than most classical ligands in its ability to adjust
to a larger range of electronic situations.