The crystal structure of bis(thiourea)copper(I) chloride

The crystal and molecular structure of bis(thioglycinato)nickel(II)

“…The Ni-N distance is 0.02 A longer in bis(thioglycinato)nickel(II) than that given in the above tabulation, but the S-C distance is 0.11 A shorter, indicating that the S-C bond has appreciable multiple-bond character. The average distance here, 1.719+0.005 A, agrees well with the 'double bond' length (1.71 +0.02 A) found in N,N'-ethylenethiourea (Wheatley, 1953) and the 'double bond' lengths found in bis(thiourea)copper(I) chloride (Spofford & Amma, 1970) but it is appreciably longer than the bond in CS2 (1.55 3,) (Guenther, 1959) and Table 4. Deviations of atoms from least-squares planes (A × 10 a) Boldface deviations indicate the atoms used to define the least-squares plane.…”

Template-mediated growth of Cu3SnS4 nanoshell tubes

“…We think that the formation of 1D structured precursors may stem from the presence of infinite chains in Cu + -thiourea complexes [32,33]. From the comparison of experiment results, it follows that the growth of Cu 3 SnS 4 nanoshell tubes may be greatly related to the 1D-structured morphology of the preformed precursors in the reaction system.…”

Hydrogen‐Bonded Network and Layered Supramolecular Structures Assembled from ClO4− Counterions with Unprecedented Monomeric [AgL2]+ and Chain Polymeric [AgL2]nn+ Complex Cations (L = Thioamide or Thiourea‐Like Ligands)

“…[57] It contains both nearly trigonal-planar AgS 3 and flattened tetrahedral AgS 3 ···Cl environments. The corresponding complex Cu(tu) 2 Cl [58] adopts a similar structure.…”

“…This corresponds to an AgϪSϪAg three-centre, fourelectron bonding system (type A), with ideal ''twist'' angles of 0°and 180°and an AgϪSϪAg bond angle of 120°; here the line defined by the two N atoms (in thiourea ligands) or its corresponding N···C vector (in thiomonoamides) would be essentially parallel to the Ag···Ag line. Some examples of this arrangement [57,58,63] are included in Table 4, which also shows that all four ligands in complex 2 have tilt angles between 79 and 85°and pairs of ''twist'' angles markedly different from 0 or 180°. Thus, each of these ligands is almost normal to the Ag 2 S unit to which it is attached, making the simultaneous involvement of both sulfur sp 2 orbitals and electron pairs in the formation of AgϪSϪAg bridges unlikely.…”