1964
DOI: 10.1107/s0365110x64001803
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The crystal structure of dicobalt octacarbonyl

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
74
0
2

Year Published

1975
1975
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 245 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
6
74
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Although chemical intuition (here conveyed by the socalled 18-electron rule) and the observed MM distances in M 2 (CO) n systems would suggest the presence of single, localized MM bonds, 4 it was soon recognized that such a simplified scheme cannot correctly explain this bonding, which actually originates from the interplay of more valence bond configurations. The complexity of the interactions increases when one or more carbonyl ligands bridge two metals (supported MM bond), and the presence of a direct MM bond is in fact more questionable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although chemical intuition (here conveyed by the socalled 18-electron rule) and the observed MM distances in M 2 (CO) n systems would suggest the presence of single, localized MM bonds, 4 it was soon recognized that such a simplified scheme cannot correctly explain this bonding, which actually originates from the interplay of more valence bond configurations. The complexity of the interactions increases when one or more carbonyl ligands bridge two metals (supported MM bond), and the presence of a direct MM bond is in fact more questionable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sumner et al (1964) proposed a simple pairing scheme which invokes a metal-metal bond directed along the line connecting the metal atoms to satisfy the 18-electron rule. The existence of a direct metal-metal bond in both compounds seems to have been quite generally accepted (Braterman, 1972;Cotton & Wilkinson, 1972, and other textbooks).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The coordination geometry of the metal center does not exhibit any noticeable deviation from that of regular alkyne dicobalt complexes [12]. The Co Ã/Co bond length (2.468(2) Å ) is shorter than the Co Ã/Co bond length of 2.52 Å in [Co 2 (CO) 8 ] [13], but is similar to Co Ã/Co lengths found in related m-alkyne complexes [14]. The bond length between C1 and C2 is 1.301 Å and the dihedral angle between C1 Ã/C2 Ã/C3 is 142.158.…”
Section: Hyperpolarizability Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%